Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DainBramage
"What idiot would attack Iran?"

Or put another way,
"what idiot would be afraid to attack a weak, zero country that is building nuclear bombs in an attempt to destabalize the middle east, nuke Israel and possibly even nuke the U.S. itself"?

Before you answer about how "dangerous" it would be to attack Iran, bear in mind that the insignificant Saddam Hussein attacked Iran and fought them to a standstill, killing, some estimates say, millions of Iranians. The Iranians could not defeat Saddam, and in fact greatly feared him. The Iranians would love to wipe Israel off the map, but fear them too much to try it. But you say only an "idiot" would attack Iran? You are hiding this Administration's gross mismanagement of the war against radical islam under a silly facade that claims Iran is too "dangerous" to attack. Some 'superpower' we are if we're afraid of Iran.

FACT, today Iran is nothing. But if we wait for somebody else to take care of them for us.... they will soon enough be a nuclear power with ICBMs, and then it will be too late.

91 posted on 10/23/2006 4:26:05 PM PDT by TheCrusader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: TheCrusader
Ooooh... real smart...jump into a new war before you finsih the first two.

Im not against ever attacking Iran, just not until its most advantageous.

Hell lets attack NK and Syria since it seemd so easy for you arm chair generals .

Tell me how you would have run the Iraq war so efficiently? Whats your experience at it...Battleship...King of the Hill...movies?

You make me sick. Cut and run...point fingers. Sheesh

135 posted on 10/23/2006 5:40:35 PM PDT by DainBramage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson