Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wideawake
So you've seen a breakdown of where the Enron stock in the plan was, contributory vs match? Otherwise your suggestion that they should have made more conservative investments is well.. speculative. ;>)

A rational person would have taken the free Enron stock, but used their own contribution on more conservative investments.

110 posted on 10/23/2006 2:56:36 PM PDT by Ready4Freddy ("Everyone knows there's a difference between Muslims and terrorists. No one knows what it is, tho...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]


To: Ready4Freddy
Otherwise your suggestion that they should have made more conservative investments is well.. speculative.

It isn't speculative at all.

A match is a match - the same nominal dollar amount of equity for every dollar of cash contributed by the plan owner.

Everyone knows that a single stock is riskier and more volatile than a diversified portfolio of similar stocks. Everyone also knows that a value stock is less volatile than a growth stock.

Therefore it is not speculative to say that if your motivation is preservation of your investment over a short time horizon, it is a financially sound decision to invest in a diversified portfolio of value stocks as opposed to putting all your money in a single growth stock.

113 posted on 10/23/2006 3:01:34 PM PDT by wideawake ("The nation which forgets its defenders will itself be forgotten." - Calvin Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson