"This isn't a cheering contest here. This is not about beating the other side even. Its about six years of votes during world war three."
He shoots ... he scores.
Still, if it were me, my algorithm would be: If polls are 10% or closer vote Lieberman, if Lieberman is way out in front, like 15-20 points up, vote for the GOP candidate to show the flag.
It's a very unusual race, and I agree the #1 imperative is to make sure that commie Lamont *never* gets near political office. Commie is not mere rhetorical flourish, it's his family history, look it up.
Still, if it were me, my algorithm would be: If polls are 10% or closer vote Lieberman, if Lieberman is way out in front, like 15-20 points up, vote for the GOP candidate to show the flag.
''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
To do this we would have to trust the polls. I don't. Watch these 15% calls for democratic candidates in August turn into 4 or 5 point toss ups over the next couple of weeks. Look at the exit poll fiasco in 04. a blatant attempt to insure a Kerry victory. Voting is no longer a political exercise, its a chess game with the stakes being the survival of our civilization. I am even preparing for a senario over the next few years that might involve civilian take over of the government if the vote radicalizes a large segment of the country. I'm sure M-13 is being imported over the border to infiltrate cities and work with islamists to destroy US government through violent revolution.