To: photodawg
Good morning.
"-- a conservative with libertarian leanings."
That's me, but I didn't vote for Perot.
At this time a vote for anyone but a Republican for a major office is a vote for a DemocRAT and that is just unacceptable.
Michael Frazier
145 posted on
10/22/2006 10:13:50 AM PDT by
brazzaville
(no surrender no retreat, well, maybe retreat's ok)
To: brazzaville
At this time a vote for anyone but a Republican for a major office is a vote for a DemocRAT and that is just unacceptable.
Michael Frazier
''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
No. There are times when voting for a republican is throwing your vote away. This is the case in CT. As much as Schlesinger is a true republican and a fine candidate, much like Perot< he is unelectable in CT. If enough people vote for a lost cause, Lamont will will the senate. Every vote on the war and on the palestinian question and Israel will be far left. Lieberman is actually to the right of many rinos on the war, that is crucially important for the next few years. The war will increase in intensity over the next two years no matter who is running the US gov't, Joe Lieberman will swing more to the right as the country does and will be a republican vote for the war every time out. Lamont, on the other hand will side with soros and the far left every time. There are old time liberal democrats, and then there are leftists.
Support everything the enemy opposes, and oppose everything the enemy supports. Therefore; support Lieberman and oppose Lamont. Case closed.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson