To: Go Gordon
The only problem with that analysis is that I don't believe there are many, if any, targets in North Korea that would be "nuke-worthy" in any case.
It would be like Clinton using cruise missiles to take out tents and camels.
132 posted on
10/20/2006 1:01:05 PM PDT by
RS
("I took the drugs because I liked them and I found excuses to take them, so I'm not weaseling.")
To: RS
I don't believe there are many, if any, targets in North Korea Clarification: By SK and Japan going nuke, I meant they would become nations with nukes. The perceived threat from them having nukes would be on the part of China, not NK.
133 posted on
10/20/2006 1:19:30 PM PDT by
Go Gordon
(I don't know what your problem is, but I bet its hard to pronounce)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson