Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sabramerican

I agree that Republicans should not have been involved in this. Thankfully I don't think this will endanger the Republicans like the article states. I think people and companies will just find away around the rules.


2 posted on 10/19/2006 11:58:52 AM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: napscoordinator
"Thankfully I don't think this will endanger the Republicans like the article states."


Judging from a number of people I've talked to, all usual Republican voters, I wouldn't be too sure of that. This is one of the stupidest things the Republicans could have done during this hotly contested election period.

Rove?

8 posted on 10/19/2006 12:05:20 PM PDT by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: napscoordinator

"Thankfully I don't think this will endanger the Republicans like the article states..."

I've been hearing this for awhile about all the issues that Republicans are dropping the ball on:

No border fence? - Bad, but it won't cost the Republicans.
Increased spending? - Ditto
Dubai Ports - Chastize the base for being close minded, but back down.
Apparent mismanagement of the peace in Iraq - Don't worry, people will still vote Republican
Foley and potential coverup - Not a big deal, the base will be there.
Quietly restrict online gaming - It's ok, gambling is bad, (except for lotteries, and state approved casinos).

Sort of sounds like whistling past the graveyard.
If Republicans manage to keep control of Congress, I wonder just what they have to do, or not do, to lose it?


10 posted on 10/19/2006 12:07:30 PM PDT by brownsfan (It's not a war on terror... it's a war with islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson