Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Luis Gonzalez

"So then, using the same logic, and since France did not come into existence until 843, Charles Martel is not French"

You meant 1843, of course. I agree, Martel was not French.

And Roger Staubach was not a Dallas Cowboy when he played for Navy, even though the Cowboys did exist at the time.


45 posted on 10/19/2006 12:32:58 PM PDT by SaxxonWoods (...ON 11/7, YOU ARE EITHER WITH US, OR WITH THE DEMOCRATS...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: SaxxonWoods
No, I meant 843.

"In the 4th century AD, Gaul's eastern frontier along the Rhine was overrun by Germanic tribes, principally the Franks, from whom the ancient name of "Francie" was derived. The modern name "France" derives from the name of the feudal domain of the Capetian Kings of France around Paris. Existence as a separate entity began with the Treaty of Verdun (843), with the division of Charlemagne's Carolingian empire into East Francia, Middle Francia and Western Francia. Western Francia approximated the area occupied by modern France." -- Source

P.S. Never, EVER talk about the Cowboys when discussing anything French...including French wine, French toast, or even French ticklers.

52 posted on 10/20/2006 4:47:46 PM PDT by Luis Gonzalez (Some people see the world as they would want it to be, effective people see the world as it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson