Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SamuraiScot; Democratshavenobrains
I don't think a divorcé is someone the GOP ought to run,

Yeah, look at what happened the last time we ran a candidate who had been divorced.


38 posted on 10/18/2006 10:44:15 AM PDT by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: wagglebee
LOL! You beat me to it.
92 posted on 10/18/2006 12:40:31 PM PDT by AmeriBrit (Soros and Clinton's for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington = SCREW.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Theres nothing inherently wrong about divorce. Luckily, Reagan didn't do it when his wife was dying of cancer.


106 posted on 10/18/2006 2:23:27 PM PDT by Democratshavenobrains
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
I don't think a divorcé is someone the GOP ought to run,

Yeah, look at what happened the last time we ran a candidate who had been divorced.

An interesting question. Reagan's was a Hollywood divorce a good 30 years earlier, and no one feels sorry for anyone from Hollywood. People see the stars as indestructable idols, and don't think seriously about either party as a victim.

Today, moral issues and moral consequences are legitimately front-and-center in a way they definitely were not in 1980. And from a merely tactical point of view, a Republican needs to be purer than Caesar's wife, because he needs to survive the attacks of (pro-divorce) media types, who will attack him for being divorced.

Someone like Santorum, rather than Newt, will have more selling power.

124 posted on 10/19/2006 12:38:48 PM PDT by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson