Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: paulat
The odds of larger aftershocks go down logarithmically, according to what I've read.

That's the odds, not a reflection of what happened in reality in an individual situation.  We had already moved out of the Bay Area when Loma Prieta happened (sp?) but we had a couple of near 6 quakes while we were there from the late 70s to the early 80s and had family living there when the 89 quake hit.

Of course now we live in the Memphis area, 70 miles from the site of the largest earthquakes in contiguous US history.  There were three 8 plus quakes from November of 1811 to around February of 1812 with quakes over 5 almost every day during that period.  In California it's relatively hard seismic terrain and a quake dissipates quickly, but here it's all "gorpf" where the quake will just propagate forever.  And the folks  here don't have a clue about earthquake preparedness.  In the 1811/1812 events it is said that buildings were damaged in Washington DC and Boston from the quakes on the Mississippi.

Oh joy.

494 posted on 10/15/2006 2:14:52 PM PDT by Phsstpok (Often wrong, but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 477 | View Replies ]


To: Phsstpok

I never knew that.


496 posted on 10/15/2006 2:15:45 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 494 | View Replies ]

To: Phsstpok
That is a big cool word.
logarithmically
I like how it sounds smooth kinda flows of the tongue. Does it mean odds going down in the chances of going up or down?
540 posted on 10/15/2006 2:56:12 PM PDT by Global2010
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 494 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson