Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JimSEA
The "excludes military force" is in reference to the action which can be taken if NK does not comply with the resolution, but if they put up a struggle or have an armed escort tagging along then you don't need specific wording to tell you how to respond in self defense.

I'm sure the Navy already has ROE for such operations.

128 posted on 10/14/2006 12:16:02 PM PDT by maquiladora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]


To: maquiladora

What if North Korea refuses to let them board? Do we have to wait for a new resolution in order for our guys to be able to force themselves at weapon-point on to the ship? The "excludes military force" is a pretty big thing. I think it will come back to bite us in the rear, especially if our guys do something that China or Russia consider "military force".


133 posted on 10/14/2006 12:24:04 PM PDT by NinoFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]

To: maquiladora
I'm sure the Navy already has ROE for such operations.

No doubt.

157 posted on 10/14/2006 1:15:32 PM PDT by Michael Goldsberry (Lt. Bruce C. Fryar USN 01-02-70 Laos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson