[Auntie Mame]

Thanks, BoneHead, for this information. I will fix my article and the judicial section. It's been over two years since I've re-read it and I notice it needs a lot of work. Guess I needed some distance to find more flaws.

You remarked that they sure like to censure, admonish and reprove. I respectfully disagree. If you actually add up the names of those they've censured, admonished and reproved, and consider how MANY judge's there actually are and have been in this state since 1960, and remember, that's 46 years (and I don't know the number but it has to be in the 10-30 thousand range, that's not very many censures, admonishments and reprovals considering how many judge's there are and have been.

Anyway, I'm just splitting hairs here. Thanks again for the Commission on Judicial Performance website link. I'd tried to find it in the past with no luck. You're a gem!

[BoneHead]

Point taken on the Censure,Admonish and Reprove. I see allot of recitivism(?) in the diciplined Judges names. Same guy/gal appears more than once....

That will raise some lawyers blood pressure.....

[seenenuf]

Thanks for the 'when not to vote' wisdom (post #30) on your own page - I've forwarded it to my address book.