[Yossarian]

Made from 165 images, so not sure if it qualifies as a photograph. Sure is neat though.

If it's made with real images, and doesn't split with reality at any point, I consider it a valid photograph. Just think of it as having an unusual exposure time, and a computer-assisted lens.

When I do a mulit-shot panoramic sometimes I have to edit out things, like when someone moves from shot to shot - welding the source photos into one picture creates artifacts. I consider this a step back from a photo, more of a mosaic. But if no content editing needed to be done, I'll call it a panoramic photo.

Yossarian
panoramic photographer since 1996

[orionblamblam]

> Just think of it as having an unusual exposure time, and a computer-assisted lens.

This is it with less contrast.

http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/jpeg/PIA08329.jpg

[Straight Vermonter]

When I do a mulit-shot panoramic sometimes I have to edit out things, like when someone moves from shot to shot

But I like being in the same picture twice.