Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RobbyS
In the back of my mind, is the memory of an article--popular science stuff--that explains modernity as the result of infantilization, with the moderns retaining the relatively large skull of the infant. That would make the Neanderthal types our ancestors and collateral cousins.

I think the infantilization was to permit a large brain through a small birth canal. The trick is to have a long infancy during which most of the brain growth occurs.

It will take more than this to show that Neanderthals were our ancestors.

128 posted on 10/13/2006 9:40:23 AM PDT by Coyoteman (I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]


To: Coyoteman

The small face and jaw are also a feature of human infants. From what I have seen of Neanderthal infants, it was also true of them. Females normally have such features and if somehow these can be fixed in the males we have something approximating homo sapiens. IAC, I am bothered by so much specuation based on skimpy evidence. Extrapolations from present data, in either direction, is chancey, especially if it is driven by a philosphical agenda.


129 posted on 10/13/2006 9:49:27 AM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]

To: Coyoteman

Where do Cro-Magnons fit into this equation?


133 posted on 10/13/2006 10:22:25 AM PDT by kellynch ("Our only freedom is the freedom to discipline ourselves." -- Bernard Baruch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson