Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tehran Fears U.S. Attack [USS Eisenhower, Enterprise]
ADKNI ^ | 10/11/06 | freedom44

Posted on 10/11/2006 2:35:42 PM PDT by freedom44

Tehran, 11 Oct. (AKI) - Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei has held an emergency meeting after reports that US nuclear powered aircraft carrier Eisenhower was moving towards the Persian Gulf. Khamenei met on Tuesday night with Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, former president Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani and, the head of the Iranian army and the revolutionary guards corps Pasdaran, Hassan Khomeini, grandson of the founder of the Islamic Republic, along with advisors to Khamenei.

During the talks, Iranian online daily Roozonline reports, participants discussed the possibility of a US military attack and the consequences of potential sanctions on Iran.

According to Roozonline, Khamenei stressed the need to present a united Iranian front to the international community.

The Eisenhower is expected to reach the Persian Gulf on 21 October while another US aircraft carrier, the Enterprise, will also be allegedly close to the Iranian coasts. The Enterprise was employed in 2001 by the United States to bomb Afghanistan after the September 11 terror attacks on the US.

According to Baztab, a website controlled by the Pasdaran, "the United States is gaining positions in the sea and countries close to Iran in case the Pentagon wants to launch an attack on the Islamic Republic."

According to Baztab, the US has already drafted a plan to attack Iranian nuclear plants and its military installations by sea and air.

US president has not ruled out the possibility of a military attack against Iran if it continues to pursue its nuclear programme which it fears is aimed at building nuclear weapons. Washington is currently pressing the Security Council to impose sanctions on Iran for its repeated refusal to halt sensitive nuclear work.

Baztab also said that "if the presence of US navy ships in the Persian Gulf turned into a real threat for the Islamic Republic then the region's oil pipeline would explode, as would mines in the Hormuz Strait (a key shipping route for oil) when oil tankers pass through so as to make the price of oil double or triple."

Iran is the world's fourth largest crude oil producer.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iran
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-175 next last
To: gaijin

Makes sense, defeat Iran first...


41 posted on 10/11/2006 3:07:52 PM PDT by Schwaeky (Welcome to America--Now speak English or LEAVE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

Comment #42 Removed by Moderator

To: Psychotronic Weapon

Because these nut-jobs are not civilized enough to operate a squirt-gun let alone a nuc.


43 posted on 10/11/2006 3:08:43 PM PDT by newcthem (Brought to you by the INFIDEL PARTY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Cheburashka
That changes when we get close.

So let's get up close and personal!

44 posted on 10/11/2006 3:09:10 PM PDT by airborne (Show me your friends and I'll show you your future.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: US Navy guy

Yeah, both Theocratic Iran and a nuclear-armed North Korea owe a big thanks to that scumbag Carter.


45 posted on 10/11/2006 3:11:06 PM PDT by SIDENET (I like liberals...they taste like CHICKEN.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: OPS4
Now its time to send a couple of Nuke Subs to sit off N. Korea.

Huh? SSBNs or SSNs? And what good would that do?

46 posted on 10/11/2006 3:12:11 PM PDT by xrp (Fox News Channel: MISSING WHITE GIRL NETWORK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: freedom44
Isn't it curious that just a few weeks ago we were assured by the Iranians they had developed these amazingly accurate and powerful anti-ship missiles? Why are they so worried about just two easy-to-sink US carriers, loaded with easy-to-shoot-down US attack aircraft, flow by infidels of all people?
47 posted on 10/11/2006 3:15:26 PM PDT by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedom44
I might mention that an aircraft carrier is accompanied by several destroyers, cruisers, and submarines, it is called "Battle Group".

And the Battle Group Eisenhower has more firepower than all the World War II combined!

Yes, that tinhorn dictator should be aware of this, and a few or more changes of underwears would be desirable.

We are slow to anger but when we do get mad, the tinhorn dictator is GONE!

48 posted on 10/11/2006 3:16:18 PM PDT by Sen Jack S. Fogbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Psychotronic Weapon

ARE YOU SERIOUS???? ARE YOU NUTS??? ARE YOU MUZZIE???????????


49 posted on 10/11/2006 3:16:32 PM PDT by LC HOGHEAD ("Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things evil and inhumANE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
The sight of a carrier on the horizon is a clear message to some tin-horn dictator that his time is ALMOST up.

I doubt a carrier group would be in the area without a sub accompanying it.

50 posted on 10/11/2006 3:21:13 PM PDT by EGPWS (Lord help me be the conservative liberals fear I am.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Psychotronic Weapon
Image hosted by Photobucket.com you either forgot the sarcasm tag or your meds, which...
51 posted on 10/11/2006 3:21:30 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Psychotronic Weapon
Iran having a nuke isn't our problem and ... North Korea isn't our problem.

Is your name Neville?

52 posted on 10/11/2006 3:24:24 PM PDT by EGPWS (Lord help me be the conservative liberals fear I am.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS

AS a former swabbie, our carriers rarely had less than two sub escorts


53 posted on 10/11/2006 3:24:52 PM PDT by LC HOGHEAD ("Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things evil and inhumANE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: xrp

youre kidding right?


54 posted on 10/11/2006 3:25:38 PM PDT by LC HOGHEAD ("Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things evil and inhumANE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

Comment #55 Removed by Moderator

To: LC HOGHEAD
AS a former swabbie, our carriers rarely had less than two sub escorts

Of course.

Thank you for your service!

56 posted on 10/11/2006 3:31:17 PM PDT by EGPWS (Lord help me be the conservative liberals fear I am.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: xrp

SSGNs.


57 posted on 10/11/2006 3:31:28 PM PDT by OPS4 (Ops4 God Bless America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: freedom44
Tehran Fears U.S. Attack

As they should.

58 posted on 10/11/2006 3:32:05 PM PDT by RockinRight (She rocks my world, and I rock her world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OPS4

The TRIDENT SWS and support facilities were designed from the beginning to handle the newer and larger missile system with minimal impact and cost. By early 2003, two of the four SSBNs had completed backfit; one was fully operational and making deployments in the Pacific, and the other was finishing its final certification and testing. The second submarine will also be homeported in the Pacific. The last two SSBNs were scheduled to start their backfit in FY 2005 and FY 2006.

In the pacific and ready for action.


59 posted on 10/11/2006 3:33:01 PM PDT by OPS4 (Ops4 God Bless America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon
Is this true, and is it routine for these 2 carriers to be there?

Probably and yes, at least for quite some time.

60 posted on 10/11/2006 3:33:16 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-175 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson