To: TankerKC
Authorities may not be sure what happened,
and may be clueless as to who has survived,
and may have no idea as to what actually hit the building
but they have just announced that "this is not terrorism".
603 posted on
10/11/2006 12:41:27 PM PDT by
Diogenesis
(Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
To: Diogenesis
What the news outlets should be saying is "we have absolutely no reason to believe that that this is NOT an act of Islamic terrorism."
631 posted on
10/11/2006 12:43:17 PM PDT by
AbeKrieger
(Liberals are the Mongol hordes destroying America from within.)
To: Diogenesis
Authorities may not be sure what happened, and may be clueless as to who has survived, and may have no idea as to what actually hit the building but they have just announced that "this is not terrorism". That, of course, is as silly as positively declaring that it is terrorism.
650 posted on
10/11/2006 12:44:14 PM PDT by
TankerKC
(Step Back! Doors Closing.)
To: Diogenesis
What I heard them saying was there is no indication at this time that it's terrorism related, not the it definitely wasn't terror related. I think they mean by this that there was no indication from ATC that an aircraft has been hijacked or suddenly gone off course without explanation. That's a very highly restricted piece of airspace there and an unidentified aircraft would receive a LOT of attention, as would one that appeared to be off course or not following ATC orders.
I see water being put on the floor below the fire so the FD is up there working on it.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson