To: slowhand520
Too bad the GOP doesn't really want to win the election. If they did, they'd recognize how devastating that ad would be to the Democrats and plaster it in every media market they could afford.
49 posted on
10/10/2006 12:38:21 PM PDT by
thoughtomator
(Islam delenda est)
To: thoughtomator
Too bad the GOP doesn't really want to win the election. If they did, they'd recognize how devastating that ad would be to the Democrats and plaster it in every media market they could afford.Absolutely.
66 posted on
10/10/2006 12:42:40 PM PDT by
T. Buzzard Trueblood
("left unchecked, Saddam Hussein...will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." Sen. Hillary Clinton)
To: thoughtomator
"If they did, they'd recognize how devastating that ad would be to the Democrats and plaster it in every media market they could afford."LOL. Without spending a dime the ad has already generated an over 300 post FR thread and is currently posted prominantly at one of the most viewed sites on the internet (Drudgereport). The coverage of this one has only just started. And all for free. Free advertising is good advertising.
324 posted on
10/10/2006 4:40:15 PM PDT by
Rokke
To: thoughtomator
[ Too bad the GOP doesn't really want to win the election. If they did, they'd recognize how devastating that ad would be to the Democrats and plaster it in every media market they could afford. ]
It is the democrats turn, you know....
346 posted on
10/10/2006 5:20:50 PM PDT by
hosepipe
(CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole.)
To: thoughtomator
The best thing is, the Dems would howl, and the GOP could send out spokespeople to say, "What part's not accurate? Is this less accurate than the Burning churches ad in 1998, the James Byrd dragging ad in 2000, the 'Roberts supports clinic bombing' ad in 2005, etc., etc."
502 posted on
10/12/2006 1:55:27 PM PDT by
Mr. Silverback
(People who say there are jobs Americans won't do have never watched "Dirty Jobs.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson