why not just ADMIT that you are WRONG on this issue AND that you just don't have a CLUE about it, rather than trying evasions/nonsense/"changing the subject" ???
NOBODY knows EVERYTHING, Mr Minister. not even you!
btw, have you noted how much more civil things have become on these WBTS threads since the WORST of "the DAMnyankee lunatics" were (i heard, PERMANENTLY!) banned???
i also heard that at least FOUR of the banned "members of the DY coven" are NOW active on DU. (fwiw, that's where they belonged. FR is for CONSERVATIVES!)
free dixie,sw
Scroll back about 9 messages - 9 short little messages - and we find this stand watie gibberish:
"actually, it was the chief justice who gave the opinion that since NO TREASON had been committed AND that there was NO prohibition of SECESSION within the Constitution and/or in the US Code, that President Davis would be found NOT GUILTY by a jury of his peers(this even given the fact that the invaders would have CONTROLLED the tribunal!)."
So yeah, stand, you did SAY that Chase thought SOMETHING about secession!!!