Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dc-zoo
They both are attention deficit suffers and Clintons foreign policy was 'equalize all nations', Il may just be demanding what Clinton promised him.

Else why is Richardson still claiming we should give Il a one on one, face to face attention?
19 posted on 10/10/2006 4:16:10 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: Just mythoughts

You read my mind. Just this morning, I was thinking since Clintons offered North Korea and Iran the same deal ($1bn for nuclear reactors) and since they did not observe whether compliance was occurring or not, is it possible that they thought that North Korea and Iran should have nukes?

I started to think back on all of the cash from China to the DNC during the Clinton years, the missing defense secrets, the apparent framing of Wen Ho Lee.

Tinfoil hat* - yikes! It sounds too much as if there had been some sort of secret sale to China. After all, peacenicks didn't want nukes, but to "prevent" wars, every country should have them. Then (the theory would be) that no country would use them. If this is correct, and there's no way of knowing if it is, then they made a huge miscalculation about how wars would be conducted.

* Mine, not anyone else's. I just have to snap out of it.


24 posted on 10/10/2006 4:28:21 AM PDT by saveliberty (I'm a Bushbot and a Snowflake :-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson