Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bernard
I don't think anyone in America is madder at Foley than Bob Woodward. Bob has been relegated to only one appearance today.

Don't forget that Bill Clinton was the top story before either one of these things cam along. He must have been enjoying the spotlight before this all came along.

Maybe Mr. Clinton will hit the talk show circuit and say, "Hey! Stop talking about Mark Foley and talk about me! This Foley thing is just about sex, after all!"

I actually suspect that they rushed the Foley thing out because stories were beginning to appear in more mainstream news outlets questioning what Clinton said in his meltdown with Wallace.  The Clinton war room needed to change the subject quick because they had gotten all of the good they would get from his tantrum and anything more that came out would be negative, not only for Bill but for all dims, especially Hillary.  So they moved up the timetable on the Foley thing by a couple of weeks.  Unfortunately I think it's going to backfire, big time.  There's now time to expose their machinations and make it about their sleazy politics, their politics of personal destruction and their willingness to use blackmail or to bash gays if it suits them.

I want Rahm Emanuel, Nancy Pelosi and Howard Dean under oath and I want them to explain what they knew and when they knew it. Particularly about Mike Rogers blackmailing of a gay Republican Senator on the Alito vote (by implication, Chaffee, the only Republican to vote no).

233 posted on 10/08/2006 7:55:36 AM PDT by Phsstpok (Often wrong, but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]


To: Phsstpok
I want Rahm Emanuel, Nancy Pelosi and Howard Dean under oath and I want them to explain what they knew and when they knew it. Particularly about Mike Rogers blackmailing of a gay Republican Senator on the Alito vote (by implication, Chaffee, the only Republican to vote no).

Dems, with all their talk of being so "tolerant" are no differnt than lowlife blackmailing goons. Yeah, they really "accept" their gays - as people to help them blackmail others... wow, I'm like sooooo charmed. NOT.

242 posted on 10/08/2006 7:59:04 AM PDT by GOPJ (Dems are bi - happy to flay the GOP as (a)uptight prudes or(b)pedophile enablers--Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies ]

To: Phsstpok
You might want to read this - it shows how dems really feel -- http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1715319/posts?page=1

Incredibly, political editor Brian E. Crowley of the Palm Beach Post opined, "Rumors that Foley is gay have swirled around him for years. … But on Friday, whether Foley was a homosexual or a heterosexual no longer seemed to matter." Really? Why would that be considered inconsequential? Could it be because the Democrat Party embraces legalizing homosexual marriage and inserting homosexual material into public school textbooks designed for children as young as grammar school, as demonstrated in recent efforts by the California Legislature to indoctrinate students? That is the real story behind this media blitz that Democrats want Americans to miss.

Titled "The Gay Report," the study published data on underage sex, disease, gross promiscuity, suicidal tendencies and more.

One cannot help but applaud the honesty of these two homosexuals in publishing the results of their study, which documented that "23 percent of respondents admitted to having had sex with youths aged 13-15, while 19 percent felt positive about sexual activity within this age group." http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1715319/posts?page=1

291 posted on 10/08/2006 8:30:12 AM PDT by GOPJ (Dems are bi - happy to flay the GOP as (a)uptight prudes or(b)pedophile enablers--Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson