[Maeve]

To label people anti-science is such a smug broad brush stroke. The point is that one can engage successfully in many areas of scientific work without bowing down to neo-Darwinist macroevolutionary theory -- which still awaits some provable and repeatable evidence.

The other point is that Darwinist dogmatism is as anti-scientific as some strains of Bible-only discourse. The monolith of Darwinian theory should not substitute for Crucifix or Torah as something unassailable and sacred.

[atlaw]

What's "neo-Darwinist macroevolutionary theory"?