Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Same-sex marriage ban may affect you someday
Capital Times ^ | 10-5-06 | Bernard Z. Friedlander

Posted on 10/05/2006 4:42:21 PM PDT by SJackson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-116 next last
To: Mr. Silverback

I wonder who recruited you to be a troll at FR.

Thanks for your reply. It is refreshing to see a post that doesn't attack one personally.


81 posted on 10/06/2006 8:01:20 AM PDT by Joan Kerrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
Good points!

I would also ask Joan, where did the first pornographer come from? Where did the first Prostitute come from? Where did the first Adulterer come from? Where did the first S&M practice come from? Were they all born that way?

No logic.
82 posted on 10/06/2006 8:09:16 AM PDT by gidget7 (Political Correctness is Marxism with a nose job)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

I see news reports almost daily about children starved and tortured, neglected, stuffed into closets and chained to beds in homes consisting of moms and dads.

Considering this I'd be willing to consider putting these unwanted children in homes whose occupants want them and are willing to love and care for them as the highest priority.

Homes with fathers and mothers living together doesn't guarantee a loving home as we see and hear in the news daily.


83 posted on 10/06/2006 8:13:44 AM PDT by Joan Kerrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: wirnihi

I wonder how many of you are homosexual or know homosexuals

I'm a 66 year old great grandma and yes I've known homosexuals and yes some were obnoxious and some were not.
I've found that the character of an individual determines a person's worth, not sexual orientation.

I worked with a number of gays over the years and a few were jerks and a few were not, kinda like straights I worked with. Not all have an agenda and not all are out after young boys.

Look for the good in people and you're likely to find it.


84 posted on 10/06/2006 8:23:17 AM PDT by Joan Kerrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice

Answer me that, please.

Sorry unintended


85 posted on 10/06/2006 8:24:27 AM PDT by Joan Kerrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: olderwiser

Can a "transgendered" woman become pregnant? Can a "transgendered" man father a child?

Can a homosexual union produce children that they can "parent"?

So I guess couples who can't produce children aren't eligable either? If you can't reproduce you can't have children or shouldn't be married?


86 posted on 10/06/2006 8:27:58 AM PDT by Joan Kerrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Joan Kerrey
Then I wonder how the first homosexual came to be?I would guess that would be somewhere between Adam and Eve's fall from grace Lot's family fleeing Sodom and Gomorrah. Homosexuality probably started early in man's existence and it it quickly became a problem, even in primitive times. I'm almost cert an there were homosexual tribes that were a menace to every body else.
87 posted on 10/06/2006 8:28:19 AM PDT by oyez ( The older I get, the better I was.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: stm
{add lisp} "I can't help it I'm a queer, it's in my genes"......

Well, keep it there :^)

88 posted on 10/06/2006 8:28:57 AM PDT by NeoCaveman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: gidget7
There's no "gay" gene, but I believe that a small number of gays are affected in utero as he described.

He far overstated his case. Most are made, not born.

And even if one has the horrible misfortune of having been flooded with the wrong genes, does that then mean that we redefine marriage?

I don't think so.

89 posted on 10/06/2006 8:31:05 AM PDT by Texas_shutterbug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: olderwiser
If I ever found my self to be so gay, I could not in good conscience adopt and raise children.That's probably a heterosexual pattern of thought, anyway.
90 posted on 10/06/2006 8:34:43 AM PDT by oyez ( The older I get, the better I was.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: gidget7

That should have been "flooded with the wrong hormones!"


91 posted on 10/06/2006 8:36:59 AM PDT by Texas_shutterbug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Joan Kerrey

"So I guess couples who can't produce children aren't eligable either? If you can't reproduce you can't have children or shouldn't be married?"

Yeah, you're a whiz at illogic. Marriage is an institution because the union of one man and one woman is the only kind of union that CAN procreate, not because it happens in every specific relation. Marriage applies to the type of relation. Get it?

No, of course you don't. You think men and women can transmogrify. Apparently, if you defend this article, you believe people can also transcend their "age" and be any age they want. A teenage man can't transform himself into a 50-something woman. Ha-ha.

So. Persist in your fantasies. But my right is to refuse to participate in them.


92 posted on 10/06/2006 8:48:51 AM PDT by olderwiser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Yawn. More fantasy land claptrap from our "betters" in academia.

Apparently this genius failed Biology 101: Two butt-pokers can't make a baby. As making children is the primary reason for sexual intercourse and, hence, marriage, there's no such thing as same-sex "marriage."
93 posted on 10/06/2006 8:55:22 AM PDT by Antoninus (Attention GOP---Rule 4: See Rules 1 and 3. Rule 5: NO FOLEYS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: August West

child-molesters (who are OVERWHELMINGLY "gay")

I'm no expert but I think studies have not supported the above statement. I surely do agree that we should resist the radical gay agenda but I don't think all gays are radical either. I'm a 66 year old great grandma and have worked with enough gays in my lifetime to have learned that ones character is a more important factor in determining a person's value.

I've found that some gays are absolute jerks to be avoided just as some straights I've known. Orientation doesn't seem to make a lot of difference.


94 posted on 10/06/2006 8:58:02 AM PDT by Joan Kerrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
They don't understand that their own precious babies whom they cuddle in their arms, to whom they pour out their hearts, and for whom their families have their highest hopes are just as likely to grow up to be gay or lesbian incestuous pedophile polygamists as other people's babies down the block, across town, or at the other end of the universe.

Boy is this chump behind the times. Homos are so 2002...
95 posted on 10/06/2006 8:58:06 AM PDT by Antoninus (Attention GOP---Rule 4: See Rules 1 and 3. Rule 5: NO FOLEYS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joan Kerrey
Orientation doesn't seem to make a lot of difference.

You're only seeing what they want you to see. You need to get behind the facade...

The Truth About the Homosexual Rights Movement (Caution, graphic contents)
96 posted on 10/06/2006 9:02:19 AM PDT by Antoninus (Attention GOP---Rule 4: See Rules 1 and 3. Rule 5: NO FOLEYS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: gidget7

The author is basing his thesis on the hormonal balance of the individual in question; using this framework, we could design preference with supplements, one would think.


97 posted on 10/06/2006 9:03:59 AM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Joan Kerrey
Actually, studies prove child molesters are overwhelming homosexuals. They account for an extremely high percentage of actual cases, while being a small percentage of the population. You put a higher number on a smaller segment of society, and you have this result.
98 posted on 10/06/2006 9:04:06 AM PDT by gidget7 (Political Correctness is Marxism with a nose job)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: All
The argument that homosexuality is inbred baffles me.

We know that the Spartan community was nearly 100% homosexual. Heterosexual sex was performed on the wives to breed additional soldiers but once they impregnated the women, they returned to the ranks. Homosexuality was believed to create greater cohesion among the troops.

Male children were taught at an early age that this was what would be expected of them as they matured. In other words, it was cultural. It was nurture - not nature. And history is replete with examples.

99 posted on 10/06/2006 10:16:03 AM PDT by Paine's Ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

The Queers are throwing every single lie they can imagine at this Amendment.

And a LOT of advertising dollars, too--

But they're losing (last poll 10/1 likely voters, 53/47) and the electorate hasn't seen any PRO-amendment advertising. Zero. Zip.

Further, nobody's been paying much attention. Things will get worse for the Q's in October.


100 posted on 10/06/2006 2:43:25 PM PDT by ninenot (Minister of Membership, Tomas Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-116 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson