Do you understand that all I've done is make a provocative but rhetorical statement.
These people get in high dudgeon about what a gay guy is doing, but they have no solution to that problem ~ I simply propose a logical solution ~ ban gays ~ and we take it from there.
It is absolutely amazing how so few people have any idea what that might entail (besides the legal challenges it would present).
Still, you may have missed my post where I suggested would could also ban heterosexuals if that proved to be a problem, and we could still get all the Congressional candidates we needed if we required them to be spayed or neutered (as appropriate).
Have not yet gotten any takers for that one.
Sorry if I misunderstood you. No harm, no foul, right? I understand now that you were being rhetorical.