[Galena Nevada]

If ABC had anything more, they would have come out with it already. All they had were the prank IMs from this guy.

[TXBubba]

Wow, went to get the kids and then had to catch up on 500 more posts! Okay, now I'm iffy on whether it was a prank or not. I can see it being a prank and suddenly realizing it caused a major problem later on when dem operatives used the info. But I can also see it being another closeted gay kid suddenly seeing his secret being outed. Guess I will just have to wait and see....

[CharlesWayneCT]

News reports say there are 3 pages with IMs, not just this one page. They aren't explicit sex IMs like this one set, but they are soliciting sex.

I can't verify any of this, I just heard it on the radio, but in one case a page asked if he could stay at Foley's house and he said yes if the page had sex with him. The page was supposedly 17.

Now, again that is disgusting to me. But it's not really "using the internet to solicit sex", and in DC the sex would be legal because the age of consent is 16. But still disgusting to me.

[codercpc]

ABC said that these guys came out AFTER the original story! That smells to me, of course all of the Dems will scream that we must believe them. Maybe they are telling the truth, but I still want to know why are none of the IM's after 2003 (the email is a separate story, and although creepy not sexually explicit)? Does a true predator just stop? I want ABC to tell us if they have other IM's from other ex pages, or just their word in this October surprise.