Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cinives
And that comment is based on what evidence that he specifically targeted underage kids ?

Perhaps I mispoke. However, he did think he was writing to an underage kid at the time because the kid told him he wouldn't be 18 until later. Yes, the IMs got worse after that I agree. Except he did say something about "just dreaming" to who he thought, at the time, was an underage kid.

1,870 posted on 10/05/2006 2:56:10 PM PDT by TXBubba ( Democrats: If they don't abort you then they will tax you to death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1440 | View Replies ]


To: TXBubba



The point is, however, no matter how immoral, disgusting or whatever other adjective we want to use here, what Foley did was not illegal under DC law. These kids were not underage. The age of consent in DC is age 16; Foley knew very well he wasn't doing anything illegal.

However, there is the issue of sexual harrasment that remains IMO, not to mention the general feeling tht a 52 yo shouldn't be so interested in 17/18 yo kids.


2,123 posted on 10/05/2006 4:24:47 PM PDT by cinives (On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1870 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson