To: MOgirl
I think that the 16 year old was the page in the e-mails, not the 18 year old page in the IMs. The 18 year old is the one that now is admitting
As I understand it, they are one and the same person. He was a page at 16 and then in 2003, at age 18, he started the IM'ing. He is now 21. That's how I understand it at least.
To: true_blue_texican
As I understand it, they are one and the same person. Nope.
To: true_blue_texican
My understanding is that they are different. In fact, I believe the emails to the 16 year old page were in 2005, and the IM's were earlier than that. Sorry if that is wrong. There are some timelines at Strata-sphere that indicate that.
To: true_blue_texican
Hello,
It is my understanding that there is a boy from LA, who got the e-mails, that were overly friendly. He is the 16 year old.
Now to the 2nd young man: The 18 year old page received (and replied to) the IMs 3 years ago. He is now 21 and works for a politician in OK. The IMs were kept (by someone) and appeared last Friday.
Again, this is a hard story to keep up with, so I could be wrong.... Glad to be here, MOgirl
1,902 posted on
10/05/2006 3:04:28 PM PDT by
MOgirl
(Democrats: The Culture of Treason (and you know what I'm talkin about!))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson