Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MOgirl
I think that the 16 year old was the page in the e-mails, not the 18 year old page in the IMs. The 18 year old is the one that now is admitting

As I understand it, they are one and the same person. He was a page at 16 and then in 2003, at age 18, he started the IM'ing. He is now 21. That's how I understand it at least.
1,790 posted on 10/05/2006 2:40:41 PM PDT by true_blue_texican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1588 | View Replies ]


To: true_blue_texican
As I understand it, they are one and the same person.

Nope.

1,804 posted on 10/05/2006 2:42:13 PM PDT by jennyjenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1790 | View Replies ]

To: true_blue_texican

My understanding is that they are different. In fact, I believe the emails to the 16 year old page were in 2005, and the IM's were earlier than that. Sorry if that is wrong. There are some timelines at Strata-sphere that indicate that.


1,823 posted on 10/05/2006 2:45:29 PM PDT by wiltale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1790 | View Replies ]

To: true_blue_texican
Hello,

It is my understanding that there is a boy from LA, who got the e-mails, that were overly friendly. He is the 16 year old.

Now to the 2nd young man: The 18 year old page received (and replied to) the IMs 3 years ago. He is now 21 and works for a politician in OK. The IMs were kept (by someone) and appeared last Friday.

Again, this is a hard story to keep up with, so I could be wrong.... Glad to be here, MOgirl
1,902 posted on 10/05/2006 3:04:28 PM PDT by MOgirl (Democrats: The Culture of Treason (and you know what I'm talkin about!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1790 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson