DICK MORRIS SAYS THAT HE WAS TOLD BY A MAJOR dim JOURNALIST THAT HE HAS PROOF THAT nancy pelosi AND OTHER dim leaders HAD THE IM'S 3 MONTHS AGO!
dim leadership knew... while foley bl** (an EIGHTEEN YEAR OLD man)!
LLS
If there is a paper trail and we can find it, these reprobates should be tarred and feathered and run out of town.
So the "outrage" over the Path to 9/11 was just cover - a plan to distance the ABC Media outlet from the Democrats.
In preparation for this.
Only Clinton blew it by blowing up and they had to prematurely eject the October Suprise.
That, and it overshadowed Woodward's book.
Seems the interns and the pages have taken over the strategy for the Dem party. Amateurs.
If there's proof -- their game is over.
Now watch the MSM try to dump this story double quick and try and reboot the Woodward fairytale book
'course that was in contextual reference to "Katrina". Or this one from a linked webpage to Huffington post. The author is taking bets on what "dirty tricks" Republicans have planned.
It's entitled "October Surprise, 2006:
snip:
(5) Nancy Pelosi caught with child porn. Or drugs. Or WMD. Or something. Odds: 250-to-1 House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi is stopped at a TSA checkpoint in an airport and a cursory check of her laptop computer reveals graphic and disgusting child pornography -- apparently filmed (and participated in) by Pelosi herself. Later reports that the TSA screener has a doctorate in Computer Science from M.I.T. are quickly hushed up.
...
OK, the odds are high, but this has been the basis of the Republican party's attempt to "nationalize" the election in their favor: "Nancy Pelosi is dangerous; and America would go to Hell in a handbasket within two weeks of her becoming Speaker of the House." So framing her for some heinous crime isn't completely outside the realm of possibility. It is pretty far-out, though, which is reflected in the odds.
(5a) Widespread GOP smear campaign based on wiretapping Democratic candidates. Odds: 50-to-1 A remarkably well-orchestrated and simultaneous Republican smear campaign across dozens of congressional races, all with information gathered through wiretapping political opponents. Since Congress has basically abdicated all responsibility for wiretapping to the White House, what's to stop them from using such information politically? How the information was gathered would naturally not be made public until after the elections, so the outcome would be a fait accompli.
Oh my, Perhaps it was July that the dems knew....
Okay, but when is Morris going to deliver the goods?