Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AZRepublican

18 was legal for IM correct? and we know 17 age of consent per Gerry Studds censure. so no crime=no coverup. just a gay outed.


36 posted on 10/04/2006 5:19:29 PM PDT by omega4179 (Islam 14 Centuries of Jihad and counting./'Rats want to turn clock back to 2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: omega4179

And the libs trying to bring down Hastert and the party over this.


46 posted on 10/04/2006 5:20:48 PM PDT by jrooney ( Hold your cards close.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: omega4179
18 was legal for IM correct? and we know 17 age of consent per Gerry Studds censure. so no crime=no coverup. just a gay outed.

You would be correct if this were a democrat (ala Barney Frank), but for a Republican it is illegal.

That's from the Congressional Code of Conduct, PC version.

1,123 posted on 10/04/2006 9:28:48 PM PDT by Real Cynic No More (The only thing standing between us and complete victory over the evildoers is POLITICS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: omega4179

Internet age of consent is 18

16 for Wash. DC, but this would be under the Internet age of consent.


1,126 posted on 10/04/2006 9:30:10 PM PDT by bnelson44 (Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson