To: DManA
"Now the story is about all the politicians who called typical sex talk between two ADULT homosexuals disgusting."
Good point! The Demagogues who have been all hot and bothered (hypocritically) about this should now have to explain to THEIR constituents why THEY find sex chatter between two adult homosexuals so disgusting.....
152 posted on
10/04/2006 5:37:58 PM PDT by
Enchante
(There are 3 kinds of lies: Lies, Damned Lies, and the Drive-By Media)
To: Enchante
"Now the story is about all the politicians who called typical sex talk between two ADULT homosexuals disgusting." Clinton/Lewenski = Foley/Jordan
Two consenting adults doing what they do. The dems deny them the right of privacy. It is just talk amongs adults. Where is the issue?
To: Enchante
"Now the story is about all the politicians who called typical sex talk between two ADULT homosexuals disgusting." Clinton/Lewenski = Foley/Jordan
Two consenting adults doing what they do. The dems deny them the right of privacy.
To: Enchante
Good point! The Demagogues who have been all hot and bothered (hypocritically) about this should now have to explain to THEIR constituents why THEY find sex chatter between two adult homosexuals so disgusting.....Yes, they will. But I don't forget how hot and heavy the Dems were via Clinton/Monica to give HUGE MSM COVERAGE to the words "oral sex". And now we have bits and pieces of an "oral sex" epidemic happenening in junior high schools.
I'm seeing a parallel to then, and these "released" IMs by the press. It's "porn" on line masquerading as news.
Lots of kids are reading the news -- I should think certain LAWS in place should be enacted and INVOKED by Republicans.
VERY SOON!
359 posted on
10/04/2006 6:14:31 PM PDT by
Alia
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson