[cva66snipe]

If Clinton did what President Bush has been doing on national security, and other domestic and social issues I would have supported him 100%.

Was it or was it not GW Bush who said in 2000 in the Bush/Gore debates "Me and Mr Gore are not that far apart on most issues."? I remeber that do you? I'm very far apart with Bush, Gore, and Clinton on most issues including national defense which I am 100% for but not his policies. Who panders to China? Both have. If it was wrong for Clinton why do some support it for Bush? Party over nation destroys the nation.

[jveritas]

I do not think President Bush has pandered to China. At the contrary Clinton took campaign donations form the chicoms, big difference!

[cva66snipe]

Try this. A 25% across the board increase in active duty manpower and still needed equipment. Bush is against it, Rummy is against it, Gore against it, and the GOP and DEM Congress is as well.

[tomnbeverly]

True but I think you need to look at issues that should transcend politics but aren't. Like the War on Terror.... You know what you get with the DEMS they will not listen to Al-Qaeda phone calls the ACLU have them by the balls. They will not detain combatants again ACLU. They will retreat on the WOT, out of Iraq, Out of the Phillipines, Out of Indonesia, Out of Afghanistan, Out of Israel, because of their Anti-War Base. They will raise taxes, They will ruin the economy, they will give your and my tax dollars to support the new illegal Mexican voting block that will ensure them continued future victories at the polls. Before you start slamming Bush for being somewhat like Clinton. Think how different they are on the most important issues of the day i.e., ACTION vs. INACTION (Blame, Blame, Blame,) Makes me sick.