Still catching up on this thread.
I'm hoping for the best, but this seems like something being fed to us. Need more details.
However, I'll still stick with what I said on another thread: WHY are we defending ourselves from the main supporters of NAMBLA over this?!?!
That is an EXCELLENT point that should be driven home big time - it goes beyond the Studds / Frank double standard argument and shows the spectacular hypocrisy of the Democrat attack machine. This whole sorry episode could be leveraged to highlight how the Dems support or refuse to oppose the abomination that is NAMBLA, while criticizing a Republican who seems to have engaged in much less than what that organization promotes.