You must be 19.
Get over the age of 50 and look back....then tell me that (other than legally) there is a significant difference between 16 and 18.
Added to Drudge headline...........
ABC RELEASED TRANSCRIPT OF CHAT BETWEEN FOLEY AND A MAN WHO WAS 18 AT THE TIME OF THE INSTANT MESSAGE EXCHANGE.... NETWORK GAVE IMPRESSION MESSAGE WAS TO 'UNDER AGE' TEEN... DEVELOPING...
http://drudgereport.com/
It is still sick, but it isn't even illegal to use the internet as a 50 yr old to chat with an 18 year old and even meet the 18 year old to have sex. I don't think there is a huge difference between 18 and 16 but I still don't want 16 year olds meeting 50 year olds online and meeting for sex at 18 they have the legal right to do it if they want to.
You need to think about this for a minute. Right now, the dems are screaming for every republican leader's head on a platter because they "tolerated that pedophile" Foley. If the kid is over eighteen at the time of the messages, the pubbie leaders could not have done anything more than they did BY LAW!
What changes is not the wrongness of Foley's actions, but the ramifications of the actions of the leadership. This is a case where the dems are playing "gotcha" - regarding ONLY the pubbie leadership - without any facts on their side.
None of this would be relevant, except that Brian Ross and (apparently) the dem machine have lied their way into a corner. If the truth doesn't come out, then many good men will have chosen to do nothing - exactly how this evil wishes to triumph. The lies must be exposed.