Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sarah
Well, I can understand.

OTOH, whoever was toying with Foley in those IM's didn't appear to HAVE to be groomed..That was a two way conversation.

sw

259 posted on 10/04/2006 6:00:25 PM PDT by spectre (Spectre's wife)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies ]


To: spectre
OTOH, whoever was toying with Foley in those IM's didn't appear to HAVE to be groomed..That was a two way conversation.

from the IM, it sounded like it had been going on quite a while - I don't think a tentative dating of a single message from after he turned 18 necessarily means that this didn't start earlier..

496 posted on 10/05/2006 8:59:07 AM PDT by Michamilton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson