Posted on 10/04/2006 1:58:14 PM PDT by Gribbit
Mark Foley is a scumbag! Mark Foley is a scumbag! Mark Foley is a scumbag!
Now that that is out of the way I will reveal how I (and a few others) discovered Jordan Edmund was one of the former house pages that participated in sexually explicit instant messages with Rep. Mark Foley. Also I will explain to you why I believe it necessary to reveal Jordan Edmund's identity. You may not agree with my decision, but I hope to explain my reasoning by the end of this story.
Read More HERE!
You're the new Buckhead! Hugs! (My apologies for being smarmy at you in the Harris threads)
I am dying for tomorrow to come. I'll be all over the blogs looking for some more interesting facts.
INTERNET SEX IS STILL NOT SEX!!!
Do you, by chance, have a picture (or link thereto) of this "Ernie the Elephant"? LMAO
Your instincts were right on.
I've had dealings with two such people in my life - most are fooled, but sooner or later, their arrogance takes them too far and they get caught.
You need to think about this for a minute. Right now, the dems are screaming for every republican leader's head on a platter because they "tolerated that pedophile" Foley. If the kid is over eighteen at the time of the messages, the pubbie leaders could not have done anything more than they did BY LAW!
What changes is not the wrongness of Foley's actions, but the ramifications of the actions of the leadership. This is a case where the dems are playing "gotcha" - regarding ONLY the pubbie leadership - without any facts on their side.
None of this would be relevant, except that Brian Ross and (apparently) the dem machine have lied their way into a corner. If the truth doesn't come out, then many good men will have chosen to do nothing - exactly how this evil wishes to triumph. The lies must be exposed.
Small world..I love FR..
sw
Yup I agree. It's disgusting but it's not sex. Especially if this page was 18 at the time - it's entirely legal (at least I think it is) Now if he met the page and did something sexual when he was underage THAT IS A DIFFERENT STORY. Even at 18 I think its disgusting.
Just attending CAL and listening to Dave Matthews leads me to believe he is a DEM.
I agree - not only are they harping on the underage aspect but many cable media are calling them "children"... Actually - didn't that Dem. political ad says something about abusing children???
Keep in mind this is just ONE of the pages. There is at least one more.
But, it would be a shock that you know one of them!
It is curious that the kid has erased all his information on the web....
The group is called C.R.E.W.
Dag! This is Tang-gate all over again, but not I have a job and I have to miss everything!
I don't think that was the same kid, was it? I don't have tv, so I didn't see the kid who claimed to have exposed this years ago.
Attending Berzerkely was a dead giveaway for me. ;)
Chip Englander
You know him, or know of him? The theories above are right: he's a mole?
Regarding the attempted "political assassination" of Hastert, is it time yet for the "Oh the Huge Manatees" graphic yet?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.