Posted on 10/04/2006 1:58:14 PM PDT by Gribbit
Mark Foley is a scumbag! Mark Foley is a scumbag! Mark Foley is a scumbag!
Now that that is out of the way I will reveal how I (and a few others) discovered Jordan Edmund was one of the former house pages that participated in sexually explicit instant messages with Rep. Mark Foley. Also I will explain to you why I believe it necessary to reveal Jordan Edmund's identity. You may not agree with my decision, but I hope to explain my reasoning by the end of this story.
Read More HERE!
Same thought here too.
If Jordan was an adult then the analgy needs to be repeated that it is the same as Clinton/Lewinski =Foley/Jordan
He also describes himself as a straight conservative.. He's probably exaggerating on all three counts. I'd take it with a grain of salt.
Yes, and it was bloggers (of which I proudly count myself as one, though mine is only mildly political) that were the ones that exposed the CBS fake memo about President Bush right before the '04 elections.
You can go ahead and be disgusted all you want, but if this "kid" was legal age, then the worst thing Foley did was adultery of the heart, just like Clinton. No one is suggesting he should get his seat back, but this scandal should easily go away if the "kid" was legal.
Well, I went to Drudge. It doesn't say that the kid reported the IMs, it says the Kirk Fordham claims that he told Hasterts's office three years ago, but refuses to give the names. This is a big nothing.
I don't get it.
What have you achieved by revealing this young man's identity?
This man is working as deputy campaign manager for Istook's campaign in Oklahoma.
I wonder if he knows what damage he has done.
Here is a picture of the perp:
http://good-times.webshots.com/photo/1135481312054085421sEPAzx
His blog:
http://photos1.blogger.com/hello/256/1019/1024/Jordan%20Edmund%20myspace%20top.jpg
And his email address:
lolakana223@aol.com
His freakin age, for starters.
Laughing at an old queen.
I wonder if he got any money from Foley or tried to shake him down with blackmail?
Rossgate! Rossgate! Rossgate!
Has that been definitely established?
O'Reilly just reported while interviewing Brian Ross that this was driven by a Soros funded far left group (I missed the name of the group) in Washington. He said Fox and the WSJ now believes that to be the case.
Where are you guys getting this "bombshell" that he was 18 when the IMs happened? In one of them he says "im not 18 till feb 23." So either 1) whoever said it was from 2003 was mistaken, or 2) the conversation happened in 2003 before feb 23.
Either way it doesn't matter, I don't think this debacle was about legality for most people.
Ross just on O'Reilly. It doesn't sound as if he has heard about Drudge's report.
I say this not to be an appologist for foley, but now it is adult on adult just like clinton and monica or frank and his male concubine.
Where is the proof he was 18 at the time of the IMs?
I don't know who knew. All that seems clear is that the boy gave these IMs as proof against Foley years ago. (they're both republicans and so what?)
Drudge has an article (posted here on FR)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1713788/posts
that proves that the technique of leaking this story was a total set up, supposedly to protect minors from sexual predators, but really a fake blog to leak this story 'innocently.'
This is bigger than the Dan Rather forgeries.
I would say ABC is toast. Hopefully the trail leads right back to the Democrat Party.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.