[Mad Dawg]

I think if you trace back from the message to which you responded through the discussion you'll find it's not that simple. And even here you show the imprecise language that the smearing MSM likes. You say "the IMs" where one of the things at issues is whether ALL the IM's originated with Foley. He could have resigned if SOME of them were his.

I tend to prefer rifles to shotguns, though I can use a shotty if I have to. This is a matter which I think calls for scalpels rather than broadaxes. Your mileage may vary.

[IamConservative]

I tend to prefer rifles to shotguns, though I can use a shotty if I have to. This is a matter which I think calls for scalpels rather than broadaxes. Your mileage may vary.

As with all these scandals, the truth will keep "evolving" as long as it is sticking to someone. IMO, that is why it is important to clearly know where the truth ends and partisan fantasy begins. Most of the people directly involved in this don't even know what an IM is, let alone know that any goofball with Notepad could manufacture the "evidence" being used here.

In the end, after the election most likely, I imagine we will learn that Foley is indeed a scumbag, but, a lot of what is being bandied about by ABC as evidence has in fact been manufactured or altered.