'Gay' activist held info about Foley During campaign to 'out' lawmakers

WND ^ | 10032006

[BlueJ7]

Rogers – in a March 4, 2005, post on his website BlogActive.com – declared Foley to be "gay" and, therefore, a hypocrite for voting for legislation against the homosexual agenda. The post said: "MARK FOLEY WILL BE EXPOSED FOR THE HYPOCRITE HE IS THROUGH A MAIL AND INTERNET CAMPAIGN THAT WILL REACH INTO EVERY HOME IN HIS DISTRICT."

[Wristpin]

Don't forget McGreevey appointing his foriegn national homo-lover to New Jersey's Homeland Security position. The man wasn't eligible for a security clearance!

[John Lenin]

Whoever sat on the info is in deep doo-doo ...

[sure_fine]

thanks ping

[WVNan]

What I want to hear from our GOP leadership is statements like this: "The American people can see that the Republican Party holds it's members to account when they commit legal or moral acts and the Democrats do not do that." This kind of statement should be repeated over and over again.

[pabianice]

We are going to see more October Surprises from the Dems. Unable to win elections any longer, they instead assassinate their opponents.

[John Lenin]

I think the majority of the story is made up but the biggest offense is on the person who had the IM's because they were witness to a possible crime and did nothing. Hasterts stance is questionable but he never saw the IM's, only the e mails, which were harmless. It's Soros money behind this and that should be exposed big-time.

[SusaninOhio]

I must be dense. How can someone have another person's IM account, and is a law against that kind of entrapment when it is done by other than law enforcement?

Foley is scum, but the setup designed to impact every Republican in the country, really stinks to high heaven.

[Darlin']

I haven't a clue about IM accounts. It surely seems like he was setup... or perhaps Republicans were and Foley was an easy choice.

[Nuc1]

A number of commenter's say Foley was setup. It seems to me that he was caught. He can't possibly be set up if he did the deed. The man is reprehensible so good riddance. Our party stood up tall and did what was necessary. Our leaders should spend a day or so pointing this out and also point out the fact that the Dims don't stand tall with their "problem" folks. Then move on to other issues. If the MSM "journalists" continue to attack ask them why they are defending the DIMS. Also, put some conservatives in the White House Press Corp and send some libs packing. I think that would shake some things up.

[Fifth Business]

Rogers – in a March 4, 2005, post on his website BlogActive.com – declared Foley to be "gay" and, therefore, a hypocrite for voting for legislation against the homosexual agenda. The post said: "MARK FOLEY WILL BE EXPOSED FOR THE HYPOCRITE HE IS THROUGH A MAIL AND INTERNET CAMPAIGN THAT WILL REACH INTO EVERY HOME IN HIS DISTRICT."

What's your point? The guy is a pervert--a would-be pedophile. Good riddance.

[aHomosexualPerspective]

Perversion is the least of your worries.

Has America not learned a lesson from the past?

Homosexuals infiltrated the Catholic church (and preyed on unsuspecting individuals).

Homosexuals want to infiltrate the military (and if more closeted people get into leadership positions) they can overthrow existing military law.

Homosexuals want unrestricted access to young men/boys (i.e. Boy Scouts). That is why the Boy Scout Organization is under attack.

WAKE UP AMERICA or perish.

Are there any righteous men/women in America?
Who will deliver us from this present evil?

[Nickey]

It is very simple.
People who practice perversion which they know to be wrong are evil.
People who practice perversion and take delight in sin are also evil.

What is the difference?

How is perversion different from any other immorality which bars one from high office such as habitual drunkenness or licenstiousness?