Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pakistan is Lost — We better Get Used to That Fact
Men's News Daily ^ | 10/2/06 | warner todd huston

Posted on 10/03/2006 2:51:53 PM PDT by Mobile Vulgus

It was a nice dream. That we would have Pakistan on our side as a stalwart ally in this war on terror was such a wonderful happenstance. It would have gone a long way toward proving that not all Muslim states want to be our enemy.

You have to give President Pervez Musharraf credit. Yes, he has done some iffy things as president by oppressing certain extremists. But he has lent the USA able assistance when he could since 9/11. And, in so doing, he has made himself a repeated target of assassins, one attempt killing 14 and wounding 46.

We must not stop being grateful for what Musharraf has done for us and we should not abandon him too quickly. But the fact is, he was always on the edge of being eliminated as an ally, and by his own people at that.

He has never fully controlled his military, for one thing. He quickly found that, after he led a bloodless coup against Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s government in 1999, he never had the unquestioning support of those military officers who supported the Kashmiri separatists. And, after 9/11 and Musharraf’s vocal and active support of the US, he found that Al Qaeda and Taleban supporters filled his ranks, as well.

Further, Pakistan’s Waziristan region was never really in Musharraf’s control and is teeming with terrorist training camps and Al Qaeda supporters despite Musharraf’s efforts to stop them.

Now, on the eve of president Musharraf’s visit to Washington came word that his government has formally retreated and ceded all control of the Waziristan region to terrorists and their supporters.

Musharraf is cloaking this weakness as a “treaty with tribal leaders”, but the calamity is unmistakable to the detriment of both Musharraf’s safety and ours.

Read the rest here...

(Excerpt) Read more at mensnewsdaily.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: india; pakistan; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: sdillard
The government of Pakistan has ceded control of Waziristan to the Taliban and AQ.

As I understand it, Waziristan is the definition of isolated hell on earth.

21 posted on 10/03/2006 6:29:32 PM PDT by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: himno hero

My point is that Pakistan has nuclear weapons, so we have to keep in mind the adage that one dare not wound an enemy slightly. If we take action against Pakistan, we have to take their nukes and break their army and government -- or maybe help India to do it.


22 posted on 10/03/2006 8:58:10 PM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus

Good question. Has no good answer. We cannot occupy Pakistan,
so we have to work with whatever Govt is there or let it remain as is. We are doing the former.
A taliban safe haven though means we can never secure afghanistan, and AQ is never eliminated.

containment for the 21st century?


23 posted on 10/03/2006 10:55:42 PM PDT by WOSG (Broken-glass time, Republicans! Save the Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alia
Not really. It is certainly isolated, but as far as middle eastern countryside goes, it's actually one of the prettier areas in that part of the world. The problem is that the terrain is fairly rugged and forested, and there are no real "roads" into the region...just a handful of cattle and foot roads that happen to be wide enough to permit heav truck travel. Most people still travel into the area on foot or horseback. The Waziri's, interestingly, also tend to live on the ridges instead of the valleys. This gives them the strategic high ground and makes them both hard to reach and harder to drive out.

I did a quick search and found this page with some Waziristan photos: http://www.khpalapashtu.com/sitep/specialpages/phwazir.htm. It's dry, but it's practically a paradise when compared to the dusty hellholes we fight in over in Iraq and Afghanistan.
24 posted on 10/04/2006 1:14:51 AM PDT by Arthalion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus

They aren't much of an ally now. OTOH, India is aware of the danger of Islam, and would make a far better partner for us.


25 posted on 10/04/2006 1:16:55 AM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthalion

Your link: The land is really actually, lovely. However, it doesn't look at all like the photos I've seen previously of the location. I'll have to do some digging.


26 posted on 10/04/2006 4:45:28 AM PDT by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: domenad

I am sure the People's Republic of China might have something to say (or rather do) about your well meaning suggestions-like attacking whomever attacks Pakistan!!


27 posted on 10/04/2006 5:39:41 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: razoroccam

You can gauge the intellectual dept of this article by looking at whom the writer describes as India's head of government.


28 posted on 10/04/2006 5:40:38 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

The dept or rather the lack of it!!


29 posted on 10/04/2006 5:42:27 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Rockingham

My point is they threaten and blackmail with those weapons they strive to produce...ie Iran, and thiose weapons have no regard for surgical removal. Just massive loss of life.

With these new technologies when combined with their concept of right and wrong - which is on a totally different playing field - demonstrate how big a loss we are in for if we try to touch them with conventional weaponry.

or- giggle, giggle, in the case of Iran

diplomacy


30 posted on 10/04/2006 6:29:14 AM PDT by himno hero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: himno hero

So I guess that puts us both in the "nuke 'em to be sure" camp when the chips are down.


31 posted on 10/04/2006 10:53:56 AM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

A lot of times, I don't read the articles posted, since they seldom give me information I don't already have. I am more interested in how folks at FR react to it. It tells me which way the wind is blowing.


32 posted on 10/04/2006 5:30:04 PM PDT by razoroccam (Then in the name of Allah, they will let loose the Germs of War (http://www.booksurge.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

China would not go to war over Pakistan. They have their own Muslim problems.

Though it might be a good diversion. Hmmmmmm.


33 posted on 10/04/2006 5:36:19 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (Be a good Democrat and turn the lights out as you leave the ME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici

Actually Pakistan has been very,very helpful in helping China dealing with it's Slammies in Xingjiang province-hence we don't hear about their problem in the same way as we hear about say,Russia.Or even the US.China has mobilised it's divisions on the Tibetan border with India everytime the India & Pakistan have been at threat of war or at war.


34 posted on 10/05/2006 5:10:25 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson