Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush calls for summit to address school violence
The Washington Times ^ | October 3, 2006 | NA

Posted on 10/03/2006 12:40:22 PM PDT by neverdem

    RENO, Nev. (AP) -- The Bush administration will host a conference next week to discuss the recent rash of school violence across the country, the White House said yesterday.


    Presidential spokeswoman Dana Perino said the conference will bring together education and law-enforcement officials to talk about the nature of the problem and federal action that can help communities prevent violence and deal with its aftermath.


    Three schools have been hit by deadly attacks in the past week, the latest attack coming yesterday in Pennsylvania's Amish country.


    "The president is deeply saddened and troubled by the recent school violence and shootings that have taken place in different communities across America," Mrs. Perino said. "It breaks America's collective heart when innocent children who are at school to learn are violently taken hostage and cut down in their own schools."


    Mrs. Perino said the conference was still in the planning stages, so a specific date, location and other details were not ready to be announced. It was not clear whether President Bush would attend.


    Education Secretary Margaret Spellings, Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales and Bush domestic policy adviser Karl Zinsmeister met yesterday at the White House to discuss the conference.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: 2manylaws; 2muchgovernment; 4thechildren; banglist; fbi; kumbaya; nannystate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last
To: beltfed308
If these Brady a-holes were on fire, I wouldn't cross the street to pee on them to put them out.

Talk to "survivors of gun violence" like former Rep. Dr. Suzanna Gratia if you want people like me to take you seriously. It's her solution we should be implementing, not your gun grabber nonsense.

41 posted on 10/03/2006 1:34:30 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (Quam terribilis est haec hora)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

I agree! Crossing the street might endanger innocents :>)They are beyond disgusting. I am surprised they waited a day for their "release". In the past it has been within hours.


42 posted on 10/03/2006 1:39:23 PM PDT by beltfed308 (Nanny Statists are Ameba's.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: beltfed308

Stay safe. I have a feeling this is gonna be bumpy...


43 posted on 10/03/2006 1:42:37 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (Quam terribilis est haec hora)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
...but I'm willing to see what he says before piling on.

Fair enough. But I think the President must be made to understand before this conference that there is a large and active group of people in this country that simply DOES NOT SUBSCRIBE to the historically knee-jerk anti-gun, anti-freedom findings of "summits" like these.

He must grant representation at the table for people who understand that it's insanity to proscribe more of the same PC garbage and expect anything other than the same sad bloody result.

44 posted on 10/03/2006 1:45:49 PM PDT by AngryJawa ({NRA}{IDPA} Proud Infidel Since 1968)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar

What a pathetic assumption.


45 posted on 10/03/2006 1:47:58 PM PDT by mrs tiggywinkle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

John Lott wouldn't hurt either.


46 posted on 10/03/2006 1:51:09 PM PDT by Ladysmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mrs tiggywinkle

Believing politicians act for purely altruistic reasons is the real pathos.


47 posted on 10/03/2006 1:51:56 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar
I feel sorry for you.

And that leads me to question *your* reasons for spouting off as you have.

48 posted on 10/03/2006 1:53:26 PM PDT by mrs tiggywinkle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: mrs tiggywinkle

Spare me your empathy.


49 posted on 10/03/2006 1:54:51 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: annelizly
All the news and media coverage....I have never seen a psychologist come on and tell us what the hell is wrong with these peoples brains!

And THANK GOD for that!! These "brain shrinker" shamans are part of the problem (or a result of the problems) with the current self-centered anti-social behavior, in my humble opinion.

Used to be, "couch time" was a dirty secret. Now, whenever anything happens at a school, we blanket otherwise healthy kids with "social workers" and "grief counselors."

Hell. Let em go to the lake and go fishing and focus on life, not morbid psychosis.

50 posted on 10/03/2006 1:56:18 PM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
I don't like the sound of this at all. Watch for gungrabbing Congressmen and Senators to use this conference to influence Bush toward favoring more gun control. I'm pretty sure that some of that type will be invited to any conference on the school tragedies just to show Republican bipartisanship on the matter.

The grabbers will always turn these kinds of school shootings into a media circus focused on banning guns and punishing gun owners instead of where it should be focused, on workable measures to stop these nutjobs from gaining access to schools. I don't have any specific suggestions for how that can be done, but there are professional security experts available who do that sort of thing for corporate clients and could do the same for schools. If school boards can afford all the unnecessary foofoorall that my generation got along just fine without they can afford to hire expert security consultants.

Bush was willing to go along with the AWB, and has seemed very reluctant to come out in public support of pro-gun legislation even though he has signed the few pro-gun bill that have come to his desk. I guess the bottom line for me on Bush and gun owner rights is that I just don't fully trust his real attitude toward 2nd Amendment rights any more than I did his dad's.

51 posted on 10/03/2006 1:56:34 PM PDT by epow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AngryJawa

Good luck to all of us then. With the media driven hysteria, the poling data isn't going to look good.


52 posted on 10/03/2006 1:57:18 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (Quam terribilis est haec hora)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

They need to teach kids a "Never Again" attitude instead of teaching them submissive compliance.

Deranged gunman/perverts are best handled exactly like the terrorists on flight 91. They mean to kill as many as possible, so active resistance is called for. Fight like hell to thwart them. You may die fighting, but you definitely will die complying, and fighting may give others the opportunity to survive.

The bodies of these slugs should be dragged to the public square, hung on a gibbet, burned and then thrown onto a trash dump.


53 posted on 10/03/2006 1:57:30 PM PDT by Valpal1 (Big Media is like Barney Fife with a gun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrs tiggywinkle; OldFriend

Lets not forget that many Amish districts in PA & OH had 100% voter turnout to support Bush in the last election. That is "100%". They do not need to feel exploited.

BTW - The Amish detest grandstanding. They do not attend summits, nor watch them on TV. They do respect honest people that show up to meet them in person and offer condolences. Without a media crew.


54 posted on 10/03/2006 2:01:50 PM PDT by FreeInWV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Schools are already gun-free zones. I wonder why that policy didn't work...


55 posted on 10/03/2006 2:03:53 PM PDT by xrp (Fox News Channel: MISSING WHITE GIRL NETWORK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeInWV

President Bush is not known for grandstanding. You must have gotten him mixed up with x42id.


56 posted on 10/03/2006 2:04:10 PM PDT by mrs tiggywinkle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Oh yeah, let's spend millions of dollars "thinking and talking about this". Government at it's worst!


57 posted on 10/03/2006 2:14:23 PM PDT by ImpBill ("America ... Where are you now?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beltfed308
the Brady Campaign, working with its dedicated network of Million Mom March Chapters, is devoted to creating an America free from gun violence, where all Americans are safe at home, at school, at work, and in our communities.

Just what I expected to come from this type of useless conference, see # 51. Sarah and her ilk will be deliriously happy just dancing in the blood of those little girls for the next few weeks, and will do everything in their power to turn the PA and CO school tragedies into a cause celebre to promote their anti-American, anti-Constitution, anti-freedom gun control schemes.

58 posted on 10/03/2006 2:27:28 PM PDT by epow ("An unarmed man can only flee evil, and evil is never stopped by fleeing from it." ...Jeff Cooper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: 2harddrive

Most teachers are liberals. Liberals hate guns. Ergo, teachers will not carry guns.


59 posted on 10/03/2006 2:32:47 PM PDT by Cobra64 (Why is the War on Terror being managed by the DEFENSE Department?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: AngryJawa
"But I think the President must be made to understand before this conference that there is a large and active group of people in this country that simply DOES NOT SUBSCRIBE to the historically knee-jerk anti-gun, anti-freedom findings of "summits" like these."

People who consider themselves to be conservative supporters of the Second Amendment already gave our Congressmen a pass to violate it (with passage of the VAWA) for a large percentage of conservatives. What next class of men will have their Second Amendment rights disrespected?

The Emerson Case
60 posted on 10/03/2006 2:33:46 PM PDT by familyop (Essayons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson