Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jeff Head
There's alot of talk about reducing to 10 CSGs...that would be another downsizing mistake IMHO, particularly in light of the Chinese buildup.

Probably fewer than that. You figure that by 2008 you'll have the 10 Nimitz class plus the Enterprise. At any one time you have 2 undergoing SLEP/refueling so you'll only have 9 available at any one time.

87 posted on 10/03/2006 8:42:31 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur
I am talking about a total force of ten...which means you may have six or seven available at one time. As it is, with twelve, we can have eight or nine available.

A big mistake IMHO, to reduce any further. I'd rather see 14-16. With China's buildup, and the other threats we face, we should maintain as close to an unassailable edge as possible.

...and with all the hundreds of billions waisted on PC, liberal, social give aways, both domestic and foreign, we have more than enough money if we had the will.

91 posted on 10/03/2006 8:48:33 AM PDT by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson