Skip to comments.
New US Aircraft Carrier, CVN-77 George H. W. Bush to be Christened Saturday, October 7, 2006
Northrop Grumman Construction Site ^
| Oct 2006
| Northrop Grumman/US Navy
Posted on 10/03/2006 8:06:52 AM PDT by Jeff Head
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 261-280 next last
To: Non-Sequitur; Jeff Head
Had Gore won we would be waiting for the commissioning of the USS Franklin Roosevelt or the USS Lyndon Johnson or USS Woodrow Wilson. Aircraft Carrier FDR was decommed in the mid 1970's. I saw it in the yards in Portsmouth, VA before it went to Philly. But you're right the naming of carriers is way out of hand and some toes got stepped on with naming CVN-78.
141
posted on
10/03/2006 9:52:16 AM PDT
by
cva66snipe
(If it was wrong for Clinton why do some support it for Bush? Party over nation destroys the nation.)
To: riverdawg
JFK and Kitty Hawk are both non-nuke.
142
posted on
10/03/2006 9:56:43 AM PDT
by
Cheburashka
(World's only Spatula City certified spatula repair and maintenance specialist!!!)
To: mad_as_he$$
Either Langley or Lexington would be good.
They have to retire the present Enterprise before the name is freed up.
143
posted on
10/03/2006 9:59:00 AM PDT
by
Cheburashka
(World's only Spatula City certified spatula repair and maintenance specialist!!!)
To: JBR34
Too bad the CVN-78 Gerald Ford probably may not have its namesake at the ceremony.
To: Jeff Head
The problem is that the first CVN21, CVN-78, will come out before the exiting Enterprise is decommissioned. They will not have two carriers called the Enterprise at the same time. I believe the second ship will be the Enterprise and should be. Make the first the Halsy...or better yet, name it the Shanksville! Jeff it would have been traditionally fitting to have given CVN-78 only one name. The name of the carrier that was sank to gather the data to build that new class of carrier. It should have been USS AMERICA CVN-78. Named for a good ship ran needlessly to a very early end. {Likely with prejudice because of her very name} Several other mothballed carriers could have taken that test as well. The Pentagon was excuse my french hellbent on getting that name off the list.
145
posted on
10/03/2006 10:01:10 AM PDT
by
cva66snipe
(If it was wrong for Clinton why do some support it for Bush? Party over nation destroys the nation.)
To: Rb ver. 2.0
Whatever ship it it, it'll leak...
146
posted on
10/03/2006 10:05:05 AM PDT
by
Doctor Raoul
(New York Times? Get a rope!)
To: Rb ver. 2.0
Whatever ship it IS, it'll leak...
147
posted on
10/03/2006 10:05:14 AM PDT
by
Doctor Raoul
(New York Times? Get a rope!)
To: cva66snipe
America would be a GREAT nbame too! United States, several others. Too much politicing going on with this for sure...and you and I both know that when you politicize the military, that it will lead to bad things.
148
posted on
10/03/2006 10:06:33 AM PDT
by
Jeff Head
(www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
To: fredhead; Jeff Head
I would love to go to that. I served on two of those, Nimitz and Eisenhower. Did an overhaul period in Newport News on Ike, where I got to walk underneath the ship while in drydock. They are huge!!!! BTW, I also did a tour on the JFK during my 20 year Navy career Yea but did you ever crawl inside the boiler of the JFK and climb to the base of the stacks :>} Done that on CV-66 in 1978. Walked under it in 79&80.
Looks like the Navy is fixing to decomm JFK as well. She'll go to Boston Harbor you can bet the bank on it. JFK was done much like the AMERICA. Oddly enough KITTY HAWK has out lived them all. JFK was the last conventional but was not a KH Class carrier but rather a KENNEDY Class. The only one.
149
posted on
10/03/2006 10:07:03 AM PDT
by
cva66snipe
(If it was wrong for Clinton why do some support it for Bush? Party over nation destroys the nation.)
To: Non-Sequitur
Nixon gets a carrier first. Unlike Bubba, he was never impeached.
As an aside, it's too bad they named an AEGIS cruiser for Admiral Halsey. A new carrier would be better.
150
posted on
10/03/2006 10:10:26 AM PDT
by
Cheburashka
(World's only Spatula City certified spatula repair and maintenance specialist!!!)
To: cva66snipe
No boiler tours, but being an ET, climbed to the top of the mast on all three ships, and going up the Truman's mast in a couple of weeks, for the command I work at here in Norfolk.
151
posted on
10/03/2006 10:13:01 AM PDT
by
fredhead
(Women want me....Fish fear me....I can dream can't I?)
To: Cheburashka
"JFK and Kitty Hawk are both non-nuke."
Oops. I meant to say that the JFK was the last non-nuke carrier *built*.
To: Jeff Head
As long as they don't name it after Clinton, I will be happy! :)
153
posted on
10/03/2006 10:13:35 AM PDT
by
PhiKapMom
( Go Sooners!)
To: Jeff Head
Thanks for the Jeff Head's up..
:o)
154
posted on
10/03/2006 10:14:56 AM PDT
by
VaBthang4
("He Who Watches Over Israel Will Neither Slumber Nor Sleep")
To: Jeff Head
If Billy Jeff gets a carrier it should be in the PLAN. After all the good services her performed for them it is only fitting.
155
posted on
10/03/2006 10:17:07 AM PDT
by
Cheburashka
(World's only Spatula City certified spatula repair and maintenance specialist!!!)
To: mkjessup
Tenet presideed over the renaming in 1999 because it was in the Intelligence Authorization Act for fiscal year 1999. It was under a Rep Congress. I think it played a role in keeping him around when Bush 43 took over.
DCI George Tenets Introduction of President Bush on April 26, 1999
I agree that Casey would have been a better choice.
156
posted on
10/03/2006 10:19:49 AM PDT
by
kabar
To: Jeff Head; El Gato; US_MilitaryRules
Now, now, now, Surely you didn't mean to suggest that a ship bearing Clinton's name should be HAULING garbage....
157
posted on
10/03/2006 10:20:38 AM PDT
by
steve-b
(The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.)
To: Jeff Head
Jeff, I'm of course intrigued by the part about "potential exotic defensive systems powered by the increased energy" of the CVN-21. Are we talking chemical lasers?
158
posted on
10/03/2006 10:21:54 AM PDT
by
denydenydeny
("We have always been, we are, and I hope that we always shall be detested in France"--Wellington)
To: Non-Sequitur
I doubt that the Kittyhawk will be far behind. Maintenance budgets are getting axed left and right to pay for Iraq. She won't be around long. But here is something interesting. She out lasted all in her class namesake including and the lone newer JFK class KENNEDY. Kennedy will go out before her.
159
posted on
10/03/2006 10:23:50 AM PDT
by
cva66snipe
(If it was wrong for Clinton why do some support it for Bush? Party over nation destroys the nation.)
To: fredhead
"I also did a tour on the JFK ..."
Did you ever visit the captain's quarters? I was on a shipyard inspection crew that was checking for minor (mainly cosmetic) things that needed to be fixed at the last minute before turning it over to the Navy. There was a large adjoining suite for female, on-board guests. The "bathroom" (I won't call it a "head") had been painted hot pink, and it had a bidet - first one I had ever seen!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 261-280 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson