Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Irish_Thatcherite

Ireland is not part of Britain.
So it shouldn't be considered as the British Isles, IMO.


12 posted on 10/03/2006 5:24:38 PM PDT by Happygal (liberalism - a narrow tribal outlook largely founded on class prejudice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Happygal
Ireland is not part of Britain. So it shouldn't be considered as the British Isles, IMO.

I don't blame you, given recent history, but I thought the term 'British Isles' for the archipelago pre-dated the Empire by a loooong way. 'Great Britain' itself is a comparatively recent name, barely 200 years old.

In AD70, Pliny the Elder wrote Albion ipsi nomen fuit, cum Britanniae, ie that all the islands of Albion were known as the Britannias. He included what is now Great Britain and Ireland. Ptolemy also included Britain and Ireland as part of the same group.

Anyway, I guess more recent history trumps the older names.

15 posted on 10/04/2006 1:33:05 PM PDT by Da_Shrimp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Happygal

I dunno what the island group should be called, so.

Anglo-Celtic Isles?


16 posted on 10/04/2006 1:42:16 PM PDT by Irish_Thatcherite (A vote for Bertie Ahern is a vote for Gerry Adams!|What if I lecture Americans about America?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Happygal
Ireland is not part of Britain. So it shouldn't be considered as the British Isles, IMO.

And South America and Central America are not part of the United States of America. Should they have to come up with new names?

18 posted on 10/04/2006 1:45:28 PM PDT by Tokra (I think I'll retire to Bedlam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson