Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EDITORIAL: An assault on abortion rights [ Prop 85 ]
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 10/2/6 | Editor

Posted on 10/02/2006 12:41:02 PM PDT by SmithL

PROPOSITION 85 is a deceptive rehash of last year's Proposition 73, the parental-notification act that voters rejected. Under the guise that this is a proposition about child safety and parental rights, its backers are claiming that it's all about keeping parents involved in their children's lives when it comes to making such a decision as difficult as whether or not to have an abortion.

Don't be fooled.

Proposition 73 was a bad idea, and Proposition 85 is still a bad idea. Though the backers have stripped some of the measure's objectionable language -- a phrase that sought to embed wording into the state Constitution that abortion is the "death of an unborn child, a child conceived but not yet born," which critics rightly argued could be a set-up for litigation to outlaw abortion -- this still amounts to an attempt to undermine the state's privacy rights as affirmed by the state Supreme Court.

But let's start with the proposition's broadest conceptual idea: The idea that in the event of a pregnancy, a minor should go to her parents for guidance and support. In some 80 percent of cases, that's exactly what pregnant minors do, and we believe that it's the ideal scenario.

That leaves the other 20 percent of pregnant minors, or the less-than-ideal scenario. These are the most vulnerable girls, the girls who tend to come from family situations that are unhealthy, unaccepting or violent.

As we said in opposing Prop. 73, in cases where one or both parents are vehemently anti-abortion, the notification requirement could be tantamount to a consent requirement.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: abortion; abortionmillsdelight; abortuaries; proabort; prolife; prop85; underageabortion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: TexasCajun

I find the use of "breeder" or "non-breeder" rather offensive. Kindly keep that in mind.


21 posted on 10/02/2006 8:07:30 PM PDT by August West (To each according to his ability, from each according to his need...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cgk

Thanks for the ping!


22 posted on 10/02/2006 10:09:33 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun

Political alliances. A huge amount of money is behind Planned Parenthood and other anti-reproduction organizations.


23 posted on 10/02/2006 10:13:25 PM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: August West
Offended? You're joking, right?

"we are all going to be forced to bend over and pray to the Cult of the Anus"

24 posted on 10/03/2006 6:40:18 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson