Posted on 10/02/2006 4:42:33 AM PDT by Renfield
Just run this guy out of town and get on with the program.
It's the GOP tha really get hurt ! This guy was a SLOB
for a long time.
Democrats dont mind getting down and dirty.
Any dirty trick is ok by them as long as it isnt used against them.
Old Bubble eyes is the biggest fan of the dirty deal.
teh dems are gonna gnaw on this like a pit bull on an attackers arm. we won't see the end of this till after the election.
The GOP had better find a way to get that message out.
Worth reading for information about Brian Ross; I think you were mentioning you had suspicions about him.
Here's more from The American Thinker:
http://www.americanthinker.com/comments.php?comments_id=6256
Attention is turning to The website that started it all the title of Rick Morans post at Rightwing Nuthouse.
Stop Sex Predators came on line in late July with one post announcing its intention to serve as a clearing house for the public to report sex predators and as a resource for concerned parents and citizens.
The next blog post wasnt until August 17th.
Rick then notices something fishy in the focus on Congress that develops.
More political predators on a site dedicated to sex predators in general? Why? [
.]
After a short post giving a link to a safety website on 9/2, there is another Capitol Hill sex story about an issue that stirred the blogs a bit on 9/4; the skintern culture on the Hill that saw young women dressing provocatively in order to get ahead.
Then comes a post on 9/21 that mentions Foley for the first time:
I have been away for a while, so please accept my apologies for the lack of blog posts. BUT
.while I was away, the blog has been noticed and some shocking emails have been received! I can hardly believe it! Im posting each one below. Its proof that the Congressional Corruption of the past is alive and well today. Its up to us to expose it and stop this predatory harassment! Please promote the blog and email any further information to stopsexpredators@gmail.com . Together we will make a difference!
Why would anyone notice this blog? It has posted nothing original in its short existence. The rare postings means that it has not built up any audience whatsoever. The first Technorati reference to the blog is from two days ago. Even a Google search doesnt show it on the first 10 pages when searching for Stop Sex Predators.
And yet, 3 separate people who had contact with Congressman Foley somehow found this website independent of one another and supposedly sent emails to the owner of this site to complain about Foleys inappropriate behavior.
Possible? Yes. Probable? Ill let you decide.
Update:
Alexa.com shows the rather abrupt, shall we say, arrival of Stopsexpredators.com on the web. A two week phenomenon in terms of real traffic.
Hat tip: Steve Gilbert
Update: Tom McGuire smells fishiness:
Apparently the Mark Foley story first broke on this new blog, StopSexPredartors.blogspot.com, which started in July and brought down the Congressional leadership with its sixth, seventh and eighth posts. Color me skeptical. Maybe the blog author was an unwitting catspaw, but I would want some assurance that this was not simply a successful attempt to promote a story that wasnt quite ready for the Mainstream Media by laundering it through some blogs. And part of my suspicion arises because the blog posted emails about gay Congressmen in repsonse to a post about skinterns, scantily clad young women. Where were the emails about Dirty Old Men and Sweet Young Things of the female persuasion?
Tom also points us to the River City Mud Bugle.
Two hours later [following the first posting of the former pages emails], someone writing under the name WHInternNow published a diary on Daily Kos linking to Stop Sex Predators. The diary was met with skepticism from Daily Kos users, and received only a few largely critical comments. This diary makes an accusation, one commenter wrote, a serious accusation, but provides no evidence to back it up.
In a previous Daily Kos diary about Foley, WHInternNow made an early attempt to draw attention to Foleys peccadilloes.
Tom mordantly comments:
The story was evidently not quite good enough for the D Kos, but ABC found enough to run with it.
Here are some good questions Tom raises:
Why was Foleys opponent so sure that he had a solid accusation? Or was it a lucky shot in the dark?
And how did ABC round up the follow-up reaction so quickly?
And was it the page in Louisiana who sent his Foley emails to an unknown web-site after declining to push this story with the St. Petersburg Times? Maybe the St. Petersburg Times would not let him make an anonymous accusation.
Clarice Feldman Update: Ray Robison compares and contrasts the way the media treats Democrat and Repiblican scandals.
Links in the above posts:
http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?&range=3m&size=medium&compare_sites=&y=r&url=stopsexpredators.blogspot.com#top
http://justoneminute.typepad.com/main/2006/10/i_smell_a_rat.html
http://www.rivercitymud.com/2006/09/30/foley-page-scandal-first-broken-on-independent-weblog/
http://rayrobison.typepad.com/ray_robison/2006/10/compare_and_con.html
The Democrats will lie steal cheat and murder to get their way.
How is the gay comminity reacting?
My prediction: Dems are going to be hoisted on their own petard. I'll bet there are Dems shaking in their boots right now knowing that a full scale investigation will uncover their own skeletons. It's happened every time in the past 5 years that whenever Dems try to blow an issue out of proportion, it ends up blowing up in their faces.
"How is the gay community reacting?"
They're probably trying to contact Foley to get the page's numbers.
It really does look as though the Foley matter was planned for election season. That makes these Democrats look like pretty ugly characters. What happened to the 2 females from
Democrat Schumers office that used fraud to get Lt. Mike Steeles credit report? An all expense paid vacation for a job well done?
This is too much. Foley is now following the Kennedy 'Git out of trouble plan'. Posted on Drudge. He is an alcoholic not a pedaphile. Just like Patrick K, he throws off the blood hounds by taking responsibility for some unrelated problem. Sickening.
"TV STATION: LETTER FROM FOLEY CLAIMS EX-LAWMAKER HEADED TO REHAB
Mon Oct 2 2006 00:45:11 ET
Letter purpordedly sent to WPBF, the ABC affiliate in West Palm Beach, from former congressman, Mark Foley:
X X X X X
October 1, 2006
Painfully, the events that led to my resignation have crystalized recognition of my longstanding significant alcohol and emotional difficulties.
I strongly believe that I am an alcoholic and have accepted the need for immediate treatment for alcoholism and related behavioral problems.
On Saturday, with the loving support of my family and friends, I made arrangements to enter a renowned in-patient facility to address my disease and related issues.
I deeply regret and accept full responsibility for the harm I have caused.
Over the weekend, I communicated extensively with one of the most respected mental health experts in Palm Beach County, Florida, who has been instrumental in counseling and assisting me.
Attorney David Roth, my good friend of four decades has been requested by me to fully and completely cooperate regarding any inquiries that may arise during my treatment.
Words cannot express my gratitude for the prayers and words of encouragement that have been conveyed to me.
Sincerely,
Mark A. Foley
X X X X X "
Hmmm, seems that this might be the same type of news that Dan Rather brought us a couple of years ago?????????
Personally, I don't care about the timing or who brought it to light, even if it was intended as ammunition against the Republicans as a whole.
If the guy is a slimeball, then he's a slimeball who needed to be booted out of office and his resignation is a good thing.
Just because the Dems don't have standards for their elected officials doesn't mean we shouldn't have standards for ours.
I agree wholeheartedly with you. Does Foley think that slapping an "alcoholic" label on top of "pervert" somehow makes it better?
Sicko.
It was right for Foley to resign. But the feigned indigantion from the Dems is a tad much (considering the passes given to Gary Studds and Barney Frank), and their vocal esposual of gay issues.
Also, clearly, if the page was on ACTIVE service as a page when the salacious correspondence occurred, then it is a totally different matter than if the page had returned to home.
Second, how old was the page/former page when the salacious IMs occurred? Legally, Foley might be off the hook if the kid was over the age of consent. Since the Dems are so in love with threading the needle with regard to rights for gays, pedophiles, etc., if the kid was beyond the age of consenn then the Dems need to shut up. This,, of course, doesn't make the correspondence any less disgsuting, but it might not have been illegal.
And getting back to may earlier point...it also makes a difference if the kid was a page AT THE TIME the IMs occurred.
They practically canonized Gerry Studds.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.