To: baystaterebel
The online gaming legislation added to the port security bill is very difficult to enforce. While it doesn't outright state that online gaming is illegal, it does outlaw the payment of gaming implements through banks and credit card companies in the United States. It does not address, however, the multitude of online payment systems (such as NeTeller) that exist or what can occur through them. Isn't this basically the Status Quo?
7 posted on
10/02/2006 4:35:40 AM PDT by
frogjerk
(REUTERS: We give smoke and mirrors a bad name)
To: frogjerk
In some states with some banks it is. Here in Maine I have a Bank of America account that will not allow me to transfer funds directly to Poker Stars, Full Tilt, yadda yadda yadda. I have a Netteller account which the government cannot stop me from depositing or withdrawing. The concern is to what length the government may go to pursue an individual to enforce this legislation, if at all.
The way it was done is underhanded. What Frist and the G.O.P. hope to gain from this is lost on me. All it has done is pissed off a big swath of potential voters. Nanny State Republicans on Parade.
13 posted on
10/02/2006 4:49:51 AM PDT by
baystaterebel
(http://omphalosgazer.blogspot.com/)
To: frogjerk
Few credit cards and banks allow their cards to be used for online gaming...so alot of companies have popped up to fill the void...You pay them and they pay the casino. Of course, it costs you more.
47 posted on
10/02/2006 7:23:29 AM PDT by
Hildy
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson