Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pusterfuss
I think you are correct that Hastert, knowing only that there were emails with non-sexual content, acted the way most people would have.

Knowing as he must have known that Foley was gay, he could have been more curious about what else was out there - but I don't think that's a job requirement AND if he had mounted an investigation based on the emails only and over the objections of the boy's family, he would have been crucified for "homophobia".

42 posted on 10/01/2006 4:20:53 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Who you gonna call?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Jim Noble; Pusterfuss
It all depends on which emails Hastert saw. Some of them are supposedly very crude.
65 posted on 10/01/2006 5:13:29 AM PDT by beyond the sea ( The Shadow of Your Smile --- Anthony Dominick Benedetto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson