To: lauriehelds
Ok, its a given that Foley abused his position, especially considering his work with missing/exploited kids. But, I'm wondering where the hot for teacher crowd is on this. It seems this kid was enjoying this sexual conversation and was a willing participant. Outside Foley's job, is there really anything wrong with this? If a 16 year old boy can be praised for having sex with a hot teacher, how do you treat a 16 year old boy who chooses to have sexual conversations with an adult?
159 posted on
09/29/2006 5:40:37 PM PDT by
rintense
(Liberals stand for nothing and are against everything- unless it benefits them.)
To: rintense
"how do you treat a 16 year old boy who chooses to have sexual conversations with an adult?
You punish the adult. In our case, you punish Foley.
That was an easy question. Next!
To: rintense
You're defending this creep? WTH? The losers who support women who seduce boys are creeps, too, IMO. Adults should not be having sex with kids under 18. Period. Foley's done. He resigned. Defending him is unbecoming of you.
190 posted on
09/29/2006 6:04:28 PM PDT by
MineralMan
(Non-evangelical Atheist)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson