If you think peverts like Rep. Foley who have already accepted culpabilty (by his resignation) from the US Congress should be "wished well" without being castigated and ridiculed then "buzz off." He is a scum bag for having immoral communications with an under age boy. Got it? If you don't think there is anything wrong with what he did, you are no better than him.
You don't know that. That is what he is 'accused' of. If he's guilty, of course, he should be condemned, and I suspect he is guilty, and if that proves to be true, people should make their thoughts on it known, Majority Whip Blunt included.
But until it is proven, i.e: until he confesses, is found guilty, or at the very least, a lot more is known then is currently known, it would be totally out of line for Blunt to assume he's guilty and condemn him.
Resignation does not equal accepting culpability. When he pleads guilty to criminal charges (if they're ever made) or when he comes out and admits that he did these things, then that's accepting culpability.
And if you think dog was saying there was nothing wrong with what he did, then you missed his point entirely. His point wasn't that sexual communication with a minor isn't bad. His point was that he wasn't convinced yet that all of these allegations are true.
I agree with your comments 100%.
This "wishing well" is crapola. He should be shunned and spurned. And maybe even prosecuted if any laws were broken. How the Republicans deal with this is going to be very telling. Are they going to circle around and cover up for him, as is likely some have done already?
The RNC keeps sending me stuff asking for money. I need to write them back and tell them why I won't. Wishing sick perverts well is one good reason.