So which is it? I read and posted a article from ABC that the PM's(the disgusting ones were from '03) Are these PM's from 03 or 05?
The EMAIL is from 2005 from what I read. Those were the 'flirty' ones, but nothing explicit. ABC is reporting that once they aired that email last night, that within 24 hours, they were contacted by former PAGES(plural) with archived PM'S of the sexual kind. Believe me you, I am not trying to make excuses for Foley, but I believe this part of the story is unbelievable for the reasons stated in previous posts.
I agree with you, something doesn't seem to make sense. Of course it doesn't make sense to me that Foley would risk his career by knowingly chatting with under-aged boys so who knows.
Go to drudge and you can click on the whole conversation. It is alot more than flirty, especially this is between a teenage boy and a public official. I'm moritified. I'm glad he stepped down, instead of trying to pull a 'Clinton' and lie. That would make it even worse.
This guy's a moron, and the fact that he resigned so quickly tells me there may be even more stuff to come out. At any rate, good riddens, we don't need him. It's still a Repub district, the RNC should find someone post haste and spend a wad of cash on ads.