"They should have gone on to finish the job. Now the taxpayers will have to foot the bill for a trial. But why? We all know that he's guilty. Why would the police have kicked in the door if he wasn't? Why waste money on a trial? They should have shot the little bastard on the spot.
And when you get right down to it, why waste time waiting for the rest of her brood to go bad? Or for her to pop out more little hoodlums? You know how those people are. Once one goes "gangsta", the rest are sure to follow. The cops, if they were really on the ball, should have lined them all up in the street and popped each in the back of the head. You had better believe that that would send a message to the rest of the drug dealing neighbors!"
Is this redcloak character for real or just forgot to sarc/off?
I am sitting here jaw dropped wondering what America am I
living in and what sort of sick pathetic alleged conservative is this on FR?
Oops... My bad!
(It is, however, pretty scary to think that something that should have been obvious sarcasm just blended right in with some of the other remarks. Normally, going "over the top" to make a point doesn't require solid rocket boosters!)
It's obvious satire. Well written satire, too.