Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Children handcuffed in police drug raid (and SOP of shooting the family dog)
Albany Times Union ^

Posted on 09/28/2006 5:26:29 PM PDT by Sir Gawain

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400401-420421-440441-451 last
To: pandoraou812
Police dogs are used to help the police subjugate the citizens.

There, all fixed.

441 posted on 10/01/2006 7:07:29 PM PDT by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 438 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper

There, all fixed...... Thanks thats just the word!!!( had to look it up but it works well)


442 posted on 10/01/2006 7:16:24 PM PDT by pandoraou812 ( barbaric with zero tolerance and dilligaf?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 441 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper
Good point.

443 posted on 10/01/2006 7:44:52 PM PDT by William Terrell (Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 440 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason
The cops did a SWAT team raid for a misdemeanor. Do you think that is RIGHT?

That's presuming the story contains all the facts, and I'm skeptical that it does. (The press always seems to spin a story to give more sympathy to the 'poor minority' while makeing the 'white bureaucrats' look as bad as possible.)

IF there were no priors, IF there was no evidence of violence in the past on the part of the individuals in the house, and IF the cops knew the offense in question was a misdemeanor going in, then no, it wasn't right.

444 posted on 10/02/2006 9:43:36 AM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 429 | View Replies]

To: pandoraou812

"the dog has more rights then you if you are breaking the law."

More rights than me, period. Doesn't matter what I'm doing or where I'm at if I'm attacked by a police dog my only recourse is to take it. If the cop meant for the dog to seize me it's a "good use of force", if the dog just decides on it's own to chew on me it's mere negligence and the officer's qualified immunity kicks in.


445 posted on 10/02/2006 1:23:21 PM PDT by VRing (Happiness is a perfect sling bruise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 438 | View Replies]

To: VRing
Very true and don't feed it bologna like my husband did! The cops and judge were not happy with him for breaking the dog's training
446 posted on 10/02/2006 1:42:05 PM PDT by pandoraou812 ( barbaric with zero tolerance and dilligaf?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 445 | View Replies]

To: William Terrell; Know your rights
WT and KYR, I am a bit taken aback by your responses. What I am hearing is, "It is OK for young people to use drugs and alcohol." If this is not what you are implying than I have misunderstood, but this is what I have been discussing. Young people, not adults. Young people have no reason to be using drugs or alcohol. It is neither productive nor does it help them "experience life".

There is an age limit for the use of alcohol because it is more likely that an adult, over the age of 21, will more responsibly use it than an adolescent.

Drugs such as cocaine, heroine, and their derivatives are destructive and exceedingly addictive. They have no health value whatsoever. Their use is dangerous to the user and society.

Marijuana is a substance I may not approve of, but I agree that it is no more harmless than alcohol. I may not agree with it's illegitimacy, but I would not agree with allowing minors, or young adults to have legal access to it either.

So, in conclusion. I will stand by my statement that experiencing life shouldn't include the use of drugs or alcohol. Our youth should be prepared to encounter these issues when they are adults, not as children.
447 posted on 10/02/2006 4:25:09 PM PDT by phoenix0468 (http://www.mylocalforum.com -- Go Speak Your Mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 418 | View Replies]

To: phoenix0468

So, in conclusion. I will stand by my statement that experiencing life shouldn't include the use of drugs or alcohol. Our youth should be prepared to encounter these issues when they are adults, not as children.

I agree with you totally.


448 posted on 10/02/2006 6:19:06 PM PDT by pandoraou812 ( barbaric with zero tolerance and dilligaf?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 447 | View Replies]

To: pandoraou812
Police dogs are used to help the police. It may save them time to let the dog out and chase a person down or it can be to send a dog into a dangerous situation where a police officer could lose his life. Rather then have the cop dead they will send in the dog first. We had a stand off years ago in Bradley Beach where the criminal was holding hostages, the dog was sent in and he killed it. They had a big funeral over the dog if I am remembering correctly. My advice to you would be this......don't mess with a police dog. If one is ever set on you do not run. Most K9 officers love their dogs and they are as close to them as they are to their fellow officers. Hurt one and you are in big trouble. Thats just the way it is. I guess it comes down to this, the dog has more rights then you if you are breaking the law. The dog is considered an officer of the law it seems.

I know, I just don't think it is right. Much as I love dogs, animals in general, mankind drew a line thousands of years ago, that animal life is not the same as human life. This was not some arbitrary decision, but rather the way of nature, humans getting on the top of the foodchain. A dog being an "officer" is ridiculous, no matter how I look at it. I am otherwise a law abiding citizen, I never had an encounter with a police dog, or policeman for that matter (other than speeding tickets), so it isn't some personal issue for me.

Gabor
449 posted on 10/03/2006 3:43:39 AM PDT by Casio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 438 | View Replies]

To: phoenix0468; William Terrell
What I am hearing is, "It is OK for young people to use drugs and alcohol." If this is not what you are implying than I have misunderstood,

You have.

but this is what I have been discussing. Young people, not adults.

Then you should have said, "Experiencing life AS A YOUNG PERSON shouldn't include the illegal use of drugs, alchohol, or any other substance that will alter your personality."

450 posted on 10/14/2006 10:54:23 AM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 447 | View Replies]

To: Know your rights
"Then you should have said, "Experiencing life AS A YOUNG PERSON shouldn't ..."

Why? Because you were too lazy to read what he was referring to? The discussion was about children and teens experiencing life.

451 posted on 10/15/2006 5:52:35 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 450 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400401-420421-440441-451 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson